Cheese! Olivia Van Der Beek, 8 months, gets up close and personal with the camera as parents James and Kimberly looks on at Pampers’ First Father’s Day Cook-Out, held Thursday in New York City as part of their Little Miracle Missions campaign.
“With fatherhood, you have to squeeze out all of the residual selfishness you ever had. It’s not about you anymore – and that’s a good thing,” the actor, 34, said at the event.
 Diane Bondareff/AP |
She’s an adorable little girl!!
- L on
beautiful!
- Kelly on
What a cutie! I think Olivia resembles her mum, in this pic anyhow…
- Sam & Freya's Mum on
omgosh she is stunning!!!!!!!!!!
- mommyof2 on
Beautiful little girl, too bad her parents and other celebs support a company like Pampers (YUCK!!)
- N on
I wouldn’t be surprised if she models when she gets older. Her features (red-hair and light blue eyes) makes her unforgettable. she’s a cute and I love her name. That’s all…
- Tiffany on
Ahh so cute My babies the same age born the exact same day!!
- Sloanesmomma on
Olivia is a cutie, she has very pretty features, looks a lot like her mom imo.
First thing I noticed, aside from the baby was James’ tan, wow I wish I could be that tan now 
Anyways, cute family.
- Nella on
What’s wrong with Pampers?
- Jean on
Same question as Jean, what’s wrong with Pampers?
- Dee on
what a beautiful little girl!! Love her name! And, her mom is stunning! Dad isn’t so bad either 
- Serena on
Hi baby! She’s adorable – looks like she’s about to say something.
Re: What’s wrong with Pampers. Massive stinky landfills. The pulp fibers used for absorbing the wet waste. The bleaching process for that pulp… Those are three things off the top of my head.
- Jen DC on
Jen DC – Then your issue is with disposable diapers in general, not the Pampers brand. The disposable/cloth debate has never had a clear winner…
Olivia’s coloring is just like my daughter’s, though she didn’t get it from me! What a cutie!
- Kat on
@ Kat: Duh.
To your second point: The disposable/reusable debate DOES have a clear winner and it’s (painfully obviously) reusable. In terms of creation of solid waste products, environmental impact (energy, land- and water-use) of production and disposal, creation of toxins that lie against the skin of babies disposable diapers are the LOSER. And trust me – I ain’t no hemp-wearing, patchouli-smelling earth mama hippie either. (No offense to those who are.)
- Jen DC on
Beautiful baby girl!
- Terri on
adorable baby girl and his wife is stunningly beautiful!
- eribri on
I believe “N” is referring to all disposable diapers, not specifically Pampers.
- Tee on
her ears stick out like my lil one i wonder if they correct them self with aga
- Sloanesmomma on
No I was referring specifically to Pampers. Any company who treats it’s customers the way Pampers did after the whole Dry-Max thing disgust me and they still won’t take responsibility that their product caused thousands of babies to get chemical burns. Not to mention that Pampers is the only disposable diaper company that actively slanders Cloth Diapers with misinformation all the time. I use cloth diapers and I know they aren’t for everyone but even when I do need a disposable diaper I will go out of my way NOT to buy Pampers.
- N on
Thanks for explaining N, why you said Pampers! I had no idea. Clearly, others trying to answer for you didn’t either.
- Jillian on
OMG that is one beautiful baby! Breath taking. Congrats!
- Furture Mommy 29 on
Advertisement
PEOPLE.com reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Free Weekly Newsletter
"Your child's not looking at you and going, 'Mmm, I love a clavicle. Let me nestle into that.'"
Today!
