Cheese! Olivia Van Der Beek, 8 months, gets up close and personal with the camera as parents James and Kimberly looks on at Pampers’ First Father’s Day Cook-Out, held Thursday in New York City as part of their Little Miracle Missions campaign.
“With fatherhood, you have to squeeze out all of the residual selfishness you ever had. It’s not about you anymore – and that’s a good thing,” the actor, 34, said at the event.
 Diane Bondareff/AP |
Pick up your copy on newsstands
Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine
Advertisement
PEOPLE.com reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Showing 21 comments
L on
She’s an adorable little girl!!
Kelly on
beautiful!
Sam & Freya's Mum on
What a cutie! I think Olivia resembles her mum, in this pic anyhow…
mommyof2 on
omgosh she is stunning!!!!!!!!!!
N on
Beautiful little girl, too bad her parents and other celebs support a company like Pampers (YUCK!!)
Tiffany on
I wouldn’t be surprised if she models when she gets older. Her features (red-hair and light blue eyes) makes her unforgettable. she’s a cute and I love her name. That’s all…
Sloanesmomma on
Ahh so cute My babies the same age born the exact same day!!
Nella on
Olivia is a cutie, she has very pretty features, looks a lot like her mom imo.
First thing I noticed, aside from the baby was James’ tan, wow I wish I could be that tan now 
Anyways, cute family.
Jean on
What’s wrong with Pampers?
Dee on
Same question as Jean, what’s wrong with Pampers?
Serena on
what a beautiful little girl!! Love her name! And, her mom is stunning! Dad isn’t so bad either 
Jen DC on
Hi baby! She’s adorable – looks like she’s about to say something.
Re: What’s wrong with Pampers. Massive stinky landfills. The pulp fibers used for absorbing the wet waste. The bleaching process for that pulp… Those are three things off the top of my head.
Kat on
Jen DC – Then your issue is with disposable diapers in general, not the Pampers brand. The disposable/cloth debate has never had a clear winner…
Olivia’s coloring is just like my daughter’s, though she didn’t get it from me! What a cutie!
Jen DC on
@ Kat: Duh.
To your second point: The disposable/reusable debate DOES have a clear winner and it’s (painfully obviously) reusable. In terms of creation of solid waste products, environmental impact (energy, land- and water-use) of production and disposal, creation of toxins that lie against the skin of babies disposable diapers are the LOSER. And trust me – I ain’t no hemp-wearing, patchouli-smelling earth mama hippie either. (No offense to those who are.)
Terri on
Beautiful baby girl!
eribri on
adorable baby girl and his wife is stunningly beautiful!
Tee on
I believe “N” is referring to all disposable diapers, not specifically Pampers.
Sloanesmomma on
her ears stick out like my lil one i wonder if they correct them self with aga
N on
No I was referring specifically to Pampers. Any company who treats it’s customers the way Pampers did after the whole Dry-Max thing disgust me and they still won’t take responsibility that their product caused thousands of babies to get chemical burns. Not to mention that Pampers is the only disposable diaper company that actively slanders Cloth Diapers with misinformation all the time. I use cloth diapers and I know they aren’t for everyone but even when I do need a disposable diaper I will go out of my way NOT to buy Pampers.
Jillian on
Thanks for explaining N, why you said Pampers! I had no idea. Clearly, others trying to answer for you didn’t either.
Furture Mommy 29 on
OMG that is one beautiful baby! Breath taking. Congrats!
Advertisement
Free Weekly Newsletter
"I had to make a decision that I could sleep with every night. I did feel responsible for the young girls who I probably confused and let down. I apologize for that. But I wasn't trying to glamorize teen pregnancy."
