Comments on: Meet Marion and Tabitha Broderick!

By: veronica

veronica — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:30:35 +0000

what a beautiful family!!i am so happy for them.i think sarah is very happy james is adorable and matthew look so sweet holding his little girl wrapped in pink!!

By: Daisy

Daisy — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:18:19 +0000

How lucky can you get, what a beautiful present, Congratulations!

By: Bancie1031

Bancie1031 — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:11:11 +0000

you know I just noticed but James doesn’t look tooo happy in this picture I wonder what’s wrong or maybe he was just thinking

By: Aimee

Aimee — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:05:10 +0000

Awwwwww adorable!!! Congratulations you two have three beautiful children!! Are the twins identical?

By: CelebBabyLover

CelebBabyLover — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:10:05 +0000

Sarah M.- Thanks for explaining. I understand a lot better now, and I apologize for being so critical (Laura, I also apologize to you for the same thing)!

By: Sarah M.

Sarah M. — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:48:14 +0000

CelebBabyLover – I hadn’t thought of that first point. I had heard the same things, though. Perhaps that is what they did do. My reason for wanting to know if they are both the biological parents is just curiosity. Trying to picture who they might take after later. (If they look like them later at all. Some kids don’t look anything like either of their parents, but are still theirs biologically.) They will still have sooooo much love, regardless, if the picture is anything to go by!

By: CelebBabyLover

CelebBabyLover — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:27:39 +0000

Also, I just want to add, for anyone who might not know exactly how surrgocy works, that usually the surrogate carries babies concieved with the couple’s own egg and sperm.

By: CelebBabyLover

CelebBabyLover — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:26:40 +0000

Oh, and I also hope that we won’t hear the “are they biologically theirs?” comment every single time we see a picture of these cutie pies.

By: CelebBabyLover

CelebBabyLover — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:25:49 +0000

Laura- Please read my comment above. It isn’t anybody’s business if the twins are biologically Sarah and Matthew’s (and BTW, I’m guessing that at least Matthew’s sperm was used. I don’t know why they would have gone with a sperm donor, as it was Sarah, not Matthew, who was having the fertility issues), and it doesn’t matter, either. All that matters is that Tabby and Mary are healthy and loved.

Sorry for getting defensive. I just can’t stand it when people are constantly saying, “Are those kids biologically theirs?”. If I had kids and some asked me that question, I’d have to bite my tongue to keep myself from responding, “None of your darned business!”

By: Laura

Laura — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:15:26 +0000

Did Sarah and Matthew use their own sperm and egg for these babies?