Comments on: Tom and Connor Cruise: Laker Love

By: Truth

Truth — Tue, 25 May 2010 11:30:40 +0000

A picture is worth a thousand words. It’s clear that he is Tom’s BIOLOGICAL son. Let’s face it, the idea just makes some people uncomfortable.

By: Terri

Terri — Mon, 25 May 2009 21:13:38 +0000

Wow, Connor is going to grow up to be one handsome young man!

By: MomE

MomE — Mon, 25 May 2009 16:53:23 +0000

Sometimes I am shocked by the hurtful things people say about something that has absolutely no relevance to their own lives. Don’t these people have anything better to do with their time than publically state something that could be so hurtful! And so what if it were true? What the heck difference does it make to you?! Sheesh! This is about where the phrase “Get a life!” comes in….

In any case, I’ve always believed that a person’s personality and they way they carry themselves has an effect on their the way they look or are perceived to look. It’s much more likely that, Tom being Connor’s FATHER (sheesh!), Connor has picked up on his mannerisms. My daughter is just 16 months old, but so many times she does things that I see she gets from me, her dad, or other kids at her school. I mean, it’s just the way people are. We are influenced by the environment we grow up in.

Anyway, Connor is a handsome boy. And it’s adorable to see him with his Dad.

By: Lola

Lola — Mon, 25 May 2009 14:39:38 +0000

Thinking outside the box? No, it’s just good old fashioned GOSSIP!
and there is nothing good about it. You try to cover your self by proclaiming “this is only a thought” I think ths site is to make comments about the photos not the peoples lives in said photos. They do not look alike in the least. As others have stated it may only be that they are sitting in the same position, wearing the same color (shirts & jeans) both have watches on. Nothing else looks alike. He appears to be a very good father and has given no reason for what i’m sure would be hurtful gossip.

By: meghan

meghan — Mon, 25 May 2009 11:29:55 +0000

lol – i love the conspiracies too.

i however – don’t think they look a thing alike. their eyes, noses, mouths, foreheads – all different. i think because they are dressed alike, posed alike, and have the same expression – that they look similar – but the features themselves are not even close to the same.

By: Anne

Anne — Mon, 25 May 2009 07:10:05 +0000

Wow, he is so grown and he is so handsome. Yes, it is crazy that he is adopted but looks so much like Tom.

By: CelebBabyLover

CelebBabyLover — Mon, 25 May 2009 03:59:56 +0000

Laura- I agree! Thar’s why I always scratch my head in confusion when people express concern about how Suri is being raised.

By: jan

jan — Mon, 25 May 2009 03:21:27 +0000

Well throw in David Jannsen son of Clark Gable. But..I feel that Tom would declare his parentage because he is that kind of a standup guy..and he loves all his kids…

By: scherriea

scherriea — Mon, 25 May 2009 03:02:28 +0000

I guess we’ll never know whether Conor is Tom’s biological son or not..so I guess we can only take he and Nicole’s word, that Conor was adopted..maybe this is a case of nurture over-riding nature! either way, I love this Father-Son duo! I am happy Conor has a great relationship with his father and that his father is active in his life!

By: plS

plS — Mon, 25 May 2009 01:05:38 +0000

“but there is actress Loretta Young who adopted a baby girl, and then years later it came out that she was actually the actress’s biological daughter with Clark Gable.”

Barbara LaMarr and Constance Bennett also did this, and Marion Davies raised a “niece” who was actually her biological daughter with William Randolph Hearst.

And then there is Helen Hayes and Charles MacArthur. Their “adopted” actor son James looks enough like his father to be his twin. I have heard rumors that James was Charles’s biological son from an affair he had. I suspect this is true, especially after reading Helen Hayes’s account of the “adoption.”