<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jennifer Garner Says Daughters Are Not Public Figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paparazzi Reform</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paparazzi Reform]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is great Jennifer is speaking out.  Almost no one understands what goes on behind the scenes of these photos they love to look at of famous people doing normal things.  If the picture was taken, a camera was there and if a camera was there there was someone operating it and there were probably a bunch of others doing the same thing.  The celebrity got to walk around with a pack of people following them.  It is ridiculous.  We are trying to reform this behavior so it is safer for everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great Jennifer is speaking out.  Almost no one understands what goes on behind the scenes of these photos they love to look at of famous people doing normal things.  If the picture was taken, a camera was there and if a camera was there there was someone operating it and there were probably a bunch of others doing the same thing.  The celebrity got to walk around with a pack of people following them.  It is ridiculous.  We are trying to reform this behavior so it is safer for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelebBabyLover</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CelebBabyLover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kris- That did indeed happen to Angie. It was when she was promoting &quot;A Mighty Heart&quot;, and it was actually the movie studio that sent out the forms saying the interviewers were not to ask Angie personal questions. Of course, everyone ignored that and jumped on Angie for something that she didn&#039;t even do!

KF- Actually, the three oldest Jolie-Pitt kids were photographed going to and from school practically every day when they were in Prague in 2007 (Shi was just barely a year old at the time, and the twins weren&#039;t even blips on the radar yet!), and there were also numerous shots of Maddox going to and from school in NYC later that same year (Pax and Zahara apparently either didn&#039;t attend preschool in NYC, or were lucky enough not to have the paps discover where their school was). I do see your point, though.

Kim- I agree (although it&#039;s a pretty safe bet that it was Angelina AND Brad who sold the first photos of Shi, Pax, and the twins. It just bugs me when people always blame/accuse Angie of every decision the Jolie-Pitt family makes. Not that that&#039;s what you were trying to do, by any means! :)).

Rosy J- I think you said it best of all! To add my own thoughts, I really don&#039;t think the Garner-Afflecks should have to move or switch preschools. First of all, if they switched preschools, the paps would probably just follow them to the new one. Also, why should they disrupt Violet&#039;s routinue by pulling her out of a preschool she probably loves? At that age, adjusting to a new school is often a difficult process.

On the same note, Ben and Jen very likely don&#039;t want to take Violet away from her friends, favorite places, and other things to move somewhere else (Sera, obviously, is too little to be all that affected by a move).

I also have to chuckle at the fact that people are constantly saying that the Jolie-Pitts need to stop moving around so much and stay in one place for awhile (nevermind the fact that, with the exception of trips lasting a week or two during Awards season and other times, the J-Ps have stayed in one place for several months at a time throughout the past year. First France, then Germany, now Long Island).....but now people are saying that the Garner-Afflecks should consider moving!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris- That did indeed happen to Angie. It was when she was promoting &#8220;A Mighty Heart&#8221;, and it was actually the movie studio that sent out the forms saying the interviewers were not to ask Angie personal questions. Of course, everyone ignored that and jumped on Angie for something that she didn&#8217;t even do!</p>
<p>KF- Actually, the three oldest Jolie-Pitt kids were photographed going to and from school practically every day when they were in Prague in 2007 (Shi was just barely a year old at the time, and the twins weren&#8217;t even blips on the radar yet!), and there were also numerous shots of Maddox going to and from school in NYC later that same year (Pax and Zahara apparently either didn&#8217;t attend preschool in NYC, or were lucky enough not to have the paps discover where their school was). I do see your point, though.</p>
<p>Kim- I agree (although it&#8217;s a pretty safe bet that it was Angelina AND Brad who sold the first photos of Shi, Pax, and the twins. It just bugs me when people always blame/accuse Angie of every decision the Jolie-Pitt family makes. Not that that&#8217;s what you were trying to do, by any means! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>Rosy J- I think you said it best of all! To add my own thoughts, I really don&#8217;t think the Garner-Afflecks should have to move or switch preschools. First of all, if they switched preschools, the paps would probably just follow them to the new one. Also, why should they disrupt Violet&#8217;s routinue by pulling her out of a preschool she probably loves? At that age, adjusting to a new school is often a difficult process.</p>
<p>On the same note, Ben and Jen very likely don&#8217;t want to take Violet away from her friends, favorite places, and other things to move somewhere else (Sera, obviously, is too little to be all that affected by a move).</p>
<p>I also have to chuckle at the fact that people are constantly saying that the Jolie-Pitts need to stop moving around so much and stay in one place for awhile (nevermind the fact that, with the exception of trips lasting a week or two during Awards season and other times, the J-Ps have stayed in one place for several months at a time throughout the past year. First France, then Germany, now Long Island)&#8230;..but now people are saying that the Garner-Afflecks should consider moving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the paparazzi can&#039;t take photos on private property, would it not be possible for Jen and  Ben to work out something with the preschool so they could go in &amp; out a different door?  I&#039;m just thinking of my own situation with taking my daughter to preschool (and imagining what that would be like if I were followed by paparazzi, ha ha ha!!!).  In my case, I would just park at the far end of the parking lot an go in and out the back door, simple!  Someone would definitely need a telephoto lens to be off the school property and still get a good photo.  Going in might be harder because the back door is always locked from the outside, but I&#039;m sure if I had millions I could work something out with the school...or send my assistant or security person in through the front to unlock it ;o)  And for what it&#039;s worth, my daughter&#039;s school is in a pretty urban setting, not on a huge piece of property, and this plan would still work... of course it all depends on the school&#039;s set up.

Ok, so I sort of poke fun there... but seriously, presumably the preschool is private property so there must be something they could pursue there... or if children really are getting scared or - even worse - hurt, they could they not file some sort of formal complaint against the paparazzi with police or the city?  Or get a restraining order?  Or just ask nicely for them to shoot their photos from afar, a la Brad Pitt?  Or say they can take photos on Tuesday mornings and they&#039;ll pose and smile, as long as they leave them alone the rest of the days?  It just seems like there must be some possible solution for them if they really look for one, because there really don&#039;t seem to be daily photos of any other celebrities&#039; children when they go to/from school...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the paparazzi can&#8217;t take photos on private property, would it not be possible for Jen and  Ben to work out something with the preschool so they could go in &amp; out a different door?  I&#8217;m just thinking of my own situation with taking my daughter to preschool (and imagining what that would be like if I were followed by paparazzi, ha ha ha!!!).  In my case, I would just park at the far end of the parking lot an go in and out the back door, simple!  Someone would definitely need a telephoto lens to be off the school property and still get a good photo.  Going in might be harder because the back door is always locked from the outside, but I&#8217;m sure if I had millions I could work something out with the school&#8230;or send my assistant or security person in through the front to unlock it ;o)  And for what it&#8217;s worth, my daughter&#8217;s school is in a pretty urban setting, not on a huge piece of property, and this plan would still work&#8230; of course it all depends on the school&#8217;s set up.</p>
<p>Ok, so I sort of poke fun there&#8230; but seriously, presumably the preschool is private property so there must be something they could pursue there&#8230; or if children really are getting scared or &#8211; even worse &#8211; hurt, they could they not file some sort of formal complaint against the paparazzi with police or the city?  Or get a restraining order?  Or just ask nicely for them to shoot their photos from afar, a la Brad Pitt?  Or say they can take photos on Tuesday mornings and they&#8217;ll pose and smile, as long as they leave them alone the rest of the days?  It just seems like there must be some possible solution for them if they really look for one, because there really don&#8217;t seem to be daily photos of any other celebrities&#8217; children when they go to/from school&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Jennifer Garner and I think Ben Affleck is awesome, but they can&#039;t have it both ways.  There is a 2 solutions in this situation.  1 - don&#039;t talk about your personal life.  Celebrities have every right, and many do, to refuse to talk about certain topics during interviews.  To sate the thirst of the public, release a statement and let it be.  No need to talk about it unless you want to, and the less people know sometimes helps the situation.  2 - move out of Los Angeles.  I know it isn&#039;t fair, however life isn&#039;t fair and the paps aren&#039;t going anywhere.  If you don&#039;t want the hassle, you can move.  To say that you *have* to live in Los Angeles is, in my opinion, a load of bull.  It&#039;s not uncommon for business executives (my old boss for example) to live in one area and fly into another city for work.  There are so many actors who have great careers and they fly into Los Angeles.  Johnny Depp, Nicole Kidman, Renee Zellweger, Colin Farrell, Liam Neeson, Julia Roberts, Michael Douglas &amp; Catherine Zeta-Jones...ok, some do have houses in Los Angeles but they don&#039;t live there full time.  It can be done.  I know it&#039;s nice to live close to work, but you have to consider your quality of life.  My husband and I live within 12 blocks of both our jobs (we can see my husband&#039;s office...not just the building...from our patio), however we live downtown where it&#039;s busy, noisy and cramped.  We are not happy with the living conditions so when our lease is up, we are moving to the burbs.  Same can be done for Jen and Ben if they don&#039;t like the living conditions of Los Angeles.

I don&#039;t want to come across as inconsiderate to their problems, or that they should just deal since it comes with their profession.  It sucks for them, it really does.  I totally understand wanting to live somewhere but it&#039;s hard to live there, but they have every opportunity to better their situation.  This might not make much sense, since I&#039;m exhausted and spent an hour in a line to go voting today but I thought I would give my 2 cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Jennifer Garner and I think Ben Affleck is awesome, but they can&#8217;t have it both ways.  There is a 2 solutions in this situation.  1 &#8211; don&#8217;t talk about your personal life.  Celebrities have every right, and many do, to refuse to talk about certain topics during interviews.  To sate the thirst of the public, release a statement and let it be.  No need to talk about it unless you want to, and the less people know sometimes helps the situation.  2 &#8211; move out of Los Angeles.  I know it isn&#8217;t fair, however life isn&#8217;t fair and the paps aren&#8217;t going anywhere.  If you don&#8217;t want the hassle, you can move.  To say that you *have* to live in Los Angeles is, in my opinion, a load of bull.  It&#8217;s not uncommon for business executives (my old boss for example) to live in one area and fly into another city for work.  There are so many actors who have great careers and they fly into Los Angeles.  Johnny Depp, Nicole Kidman, Renee Zellweger, Colin Farrell, Liam Neeson, Julia Roberts, Michael Douglas &amp; Catherine Zeta-Jones&#8230;ok, some do have houses in Los Angeles but they don&#8217;t live there full time.  It can be done.  I know it&#8217;s nice to live close to work, but you have to consider your quality of life.  My husband and I live within 12 blocks of both our jobs (we can see my husband&#8217;s office&#8230;not just the building&#8230;from our patio), however we live downtown where it&#8217;s busy, noisy and cramped.  We are not happy with the living conditions so when our lease is up, we are moving to the burbs.  Same can be done for Jen and Ben if they don&#8217;t like the living conditions of Los Angeles.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to come across as inconsiderate to their problems, or that they should just deal since it comes with their profession.  It sucks for them, it really does.  I totally understand wanting to live somewhere but it&#8217;s hard to live there, but they have every opportunity to better their situation.  This might not make much sense, since I&#8217;m exhausted and spent an hour in a line to go voting today but I thought I would give my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah K.</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim, I don&#039;t think anyone is targeting Jen in particular here. But, people can and will find it odd that someone who shares so many private details about her children with the public then turns around and says that her children are not public figures. As much as I love hearing stories about the family, they need to stop disclosing such personal stories about the kids if they really want them out of the spotlight. Saying that intimate stories are ok, but pictures aren&#039;t isn&#039;t going to satisfy the media. They need to take a hard line and not sit on the fence as to how close the public can get to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, I don&#8217;t think anyone is targeting Jen in particular here. But, people can and will find it odd that someone who shares so many private details about her children with the public then turns around and says that her children are not public figures. As much as I love hearing stories about the family, they need to stop disclosing such personal stories about the kids if they really want them out of the spotlight. Saying that intimate stories are ok, but pictures aren&#8217;t isn&#8217;t going to satisfy the media. They need to take a hard line and not sit on the fence as to how close the public can get to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Heidi Klum and Seal&#039;s kids are photographed as much any celeb kids yet I have never heard anyone criticize them . Seal hates the paparazzi he has cursed them and almost hit one with a car. To my knowledge Ben and Jen have never sold pics of Violet unlike Nicole Richie, Sheryl Crow , JLO,Angelina JoliE ,Matthew Mconehey(sp), Tori and Julia Roberts(twins) so why they hate toward Jennifer Garner?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Heidi Klum and Seal&#8217;s kids are photographed as much any celeb kids yet I have never heard anyone criticize them . Seal hates the paparazzi he has cursed them and almost hit one with a car. To my knowledge Ben and Jen have never sold pics of Violet unlike Nicole Richie, Sheryl Crow , JLO,Angelina JoliE ,Matthew Mconehey(sp), Tori and Julia Roberts(twins) so why they hate toward Jennifer Garner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memommamo</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[memommamo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is sad to me that CBB/People had to be asked not to publish the photos of Violet going to/coming from school. As I recall, there were a lot of those photos posted on this blog (almost daily). I never saw the reason behind it, but am glad their wishes are being granted. I just wish the people behind this blog would have realized their transgressions before Jen and Ben had to make a statement about it.

Hooray for Jen and Ben for standing up for your daughters. It is a sad scary world out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad to me that CBB/People had to be asked not to publish the photos of Violet going to/coming from school. As I recall, there were a lot of those photos posted on this blog (almost daily). I never saw the reason behind it, but am glad their wishes are being granted. I just wish the people behind this blog would have realized their transgressions before Jen and Ben had to make a statement about it.</p>
<p>Hooray for Jen and Ben for standing up for your daughters. It is a sad scary world out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JMO - LOL!  Didn&#039;t that happen with A Jolie when she was promoting a movie?  Something about the interviewers having to only ask about the movie and not her kids.  She got a bad rap bout that one (not necessarily on here just in the general internet world).  If I remember correctly.

Interesting discussion going on here.  I always find it interesting when celebs make any kind of negative comment about an aspect of being famous and peoples reaction is &quot;well, change your life then&quot;.  Oh, and I just read a post with Keith Urban about how they don&#039;t like the media attention in regards to their daughter.  Yet, he lives in Nashville.  And it still is an issue with him.  Go figure.

Re: Christian Bale - I have to agree with the poster that said he looks like he&#039;d punch your lights out if you tried to take a pic of his kid.  And I think he would.  He&#039;s not exactly known for his even temper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMO &#8211; LOL!  Didn&#8217;t that happen with A Jolie when she was promoting a movie?  Something about the interviewers having to only ask about the movie and not her kids.  She got a bad rap bout that one (not necessarily on here just in the general internet world).  If I remember correctly.</p>
<p>Interesting discussion going on here.  I always find it interesting when celebs make any kind of negative comment about an aspect of being famous and peoples reaction is &#8220;well, change your life then&#8221;.  Oh, and I just read a post with Keith Urban about how they don&#8217;t like the media attention in regards to their daughter.  Yet, he lives in Nashville.  And it still is an issue with him.  Go figure.</p>
<p>Re: Christian Bale &#8211; I have to agree with the poster that said he looks like he&#8217;d punch your lights out if you tried to take a pic of his kid.  And I think he would.  He&#8217;s not exactly known for his even temper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMO</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they are damned if they do and damned if they don&#039;t. If they go on a talk show, say, Ellen and she says, how the kids? What are they into? etc.....if Ben or Jen said, well they&#039;re good but we wish not to really discuss them. People will find them rude as if what are they too good to talk about their lovely daughters? So it&#039;s a no win situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are damned if they do and damned if they don&#8217;t. If they go on a talk show, say, Ellen and she says, how the kids? What are they into? etc&#8230;..if Ben or Jen said, well they&#8217;re good but we wish not to really discuss them. People will find them rude as if what are they too good to talk about their lovely daughters? So it&#8217;s a no win situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah K.</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2009/05/11/jennifer-garner-says-daughters-are-not-public-figures/#comment-148877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrity-babies.com/?p=44356#comment-148877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see where both sides are comng from here. And, while I 100% agree that the paps are ridiculous and need to back off, I also think that Ben and Jennifer need to stop generating interest in their kids. I the kids are truly not public figures, then they should stop sharing stories about them. I&#039;m sure they can get through an interview without mentioning the tantrum Violet through at the restaurant or how they arrived at the name &quot;seraphina.&quot; These are things we don&#039;t really need to know but they tell us anyways. It just serves to fan the flames. If they don&#039;t want their kids to be public figures, they shouldn&#039;t have turned them into public figures by sharing details of their private life. Other celebrities hve managed to do it and still keep their careers intact. I realize it&#039;s hard not to talk about your kids, but i think it takes a definite commitment to keep your kids out of the spotlight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see where both sides are comng from here. And, while I 100% agree that the paps are ridiculous and need to back off, I also think that Ben and Jennifer need to stop generating interest in their kids. I the kids are truly not public figures, then they should stop sharing stories about them. I&#8217;m sure they can get through an interview without mentioning the tantrum Violet through at the restaurant or how they arrived at the name &#8220;seraphina.&#8221; These are things we don&#8217;t really need to know but they tell us anyways. It just serves to fan the flames. If they don&#8217;t want their kids to be public figures, they shouldn&#8217;t have turned them into public figures by sharing details of their private life. Other celebrities hve managed to do it and still keep their careers intact. I realize it&#8217;s hard not to talk about your kids, but i think it takes a definite commitment to keep your kids out of the spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

