Tom Brady Gives Jack a Lift

They are a BEAUTIFUL looking family!! Gisele looks radiant!!

- Crystal on April 3rd, 2009

Gahh so cute! I think CBB should still refer to him as John because Gisele called him Johnny so I would assume that Tom does too?

The only person he looks small with is Daddy! He looks so tall otherwise!

- Natasha on April 3rd, 2009

cute! must be hard for the baby’s mom to see these types of pics…

- hillary on April 3rd, 2009

His mom calls him Jack. He’s a cutie.

- Ryo on April 3rd, 2009

Don’t they all call him Jack too though? I saw pictures last week of he and Gisele at the park and he had an embrodiered lunch sack that said Jack. Cute pictures. Too funny seeing Tom in crocs!!

- Brandi on April 3rd, 2009

If I were Bridget Moynahan I would be extremely happy to see that my little boy has a step mom who obviously loves him very, very deeply and cares for him like I would.

- Angelique on April 3rd, 2009

Natasha, I really don’t see the big deal in calling him either Jack or John. Jack is what his mother calls him and he is with her a majority of the time. So regardless of what Gisele calls him, he does go by Jack at least 60-75% of the time.

- Sarah K. on April 3rd, 2009

Also, I’m glad to see Tom has been working out for the upcoming season

- Sarah K. on April 3rd, 2009

Tom seems like a fantastic father and he really impressed me with how he handled the situation. But I have zero respect for Gisele after the comments she made about her being 100% John/Jacks mom. She seems very arrogant and “look-at-me”

- Sarah on April 3rd, 2009

I agree. I think Bridget would be happy to see this pictures. She’ll always be his mom, but it is great to have a wonderful caring step mother as well. As for Gisele, my respect level for her has went way up. She obviously has embraced being a mother figure and really loves him.

- sam on April 3rd, 2009

i have to say after reading what Gisele said i personally could care less whether he is around them or not.. yes tom chose to marry her and outside of the fact that she seems to get a lot of publicity out of the little guy…i personally look at her a whole lot different now..bridget is a much better person then i am..and someday HER son will thank her for that.

- melissa on April 3rd, 2009

It it nice to finally see a photo of Tom interacting with his son. I have a lot of respect for Bridget for not going Postal on Tom because of Gisele’s comments. Most single mom’s I know would have yank their Ex’s into court. It’s great that she can see past this and put little jack’s interest first…it’s nice that she let them take jack to costa rico. Bridget is a true example of a great mom.

- mel on April 3rd, 2009

Oh my gosh, some people really get off by finding something to nag about. Yeah it’s a blog, but give me a break. Find some real business…….

- lala on April 3rd, 2009

I too give Bridget so much credit. I could not imagine seeing my ex’s wife holding my child.

- Karen on April 3rd, 2009

Bridget has a lot of dignity and character.

While I feel that a good relationship with a step-parent is important, to me its equally important that there is one mother figure. I think there should be boundaries, especially after Giselles look at me show. I wonder how Tom would feel if Bridget was dating I dunno..George Clooney and he sprouted off at the mouth saying he felt like his father. He was born from his loins.

haha loins.

- Elle on April 3rd, 2009

I prefer Tom with Bridget.

- Natasha on April 3rd, 2009

Cute picture.
She’s going to be in the child’s life and it’s great that she loves him as her own, doesn’t mean she’s a threat to Bridget. Giselle hardly needs the attention, compared to Bridget she’s obviously a more bankable picture for the paparazzi.

- Mel on April 3rd, 2009

Don’t post much, I usually lurk. I just wanted to say that I think its great when exes can realise that its all about the child and put that child first. As a mom to a 14 yr old that I share with my ex and a step-mom to my hubby’s daughter I would take no offense if my ex’s wife called my daughter 100% her and I feel the same about my step daughter. I’d never want her to feel different or that I didn’t love her as much because I didnt give birth to her. I think of her as mine and I love her as mine and that’s easier to do when they are 100% yours.

- Dee on April 3rd, 2009

I think the entire debate over what she said is utterly ridiculous. If your child has a step-parent, do you want that person to treat/love your child as a “step-child” or do you want them to treat/love your baby just the way they would treat their own. If Giselle and Tom had kids and she had said “I love Jack, but really he’s not my own so the love/relationship we have is different than what I have with my own kids”, people in blogworld would be up in arms. It’s a no win situation for her.

The reality is that if I have a child and i’m not with the father, I want whomever is with the father to have as good a relationship with my child as I do. Only selfish people more concerned with their own feelings rather than the welfare of the child would object to those comments.

The same goes for these pictures. Would it be better if when Giselle and Tom are out and about that they leave Jack home? How about if Giselle never holds him in public, would that be good? What about if she’s seen to always have a sour expression whenever she interacts with the baby, would that make Bridget
feel better? I think some of you people are complete nuts.

The woman said “I know he has a mom but he still feels like 100% mine”. Well so freaking what. Good, i’m glad that she feels that way if i’m his mom. Maybe that means that she’ll care for him just as much as I do when I can’t be there. Why would I want some women around my kid who doesn’t treasure him?

Also, people act like Giselle was the other woman in the relationship. Bridget and Tom date. Bridget and Tom break up. Tom and Giselle start dating. Bridget finds out she’s pregnant. Why should Giselle and Tom be pariahs because he was in a relationship that HAD ALREADY FAILED. It’s not like he left his pregnant girlfriend for another woman. Good GOD.

- Haylo on April 3rd, 2009

I don’t think a lunch bag indicates what Tom and Giselle call him. Bridget may have bought it. Cute pictures.

- Terri on April 3rd, 2009

I totally agree with Haylo…people should focus on the positive – and on the benefits for the little boy of having so many parents/parental figures that adore him! In this world where many are abused and neglected – that is a wonderful thing to have!

Gisele doesn’t need her step-son to attract the paparazzi – she has always been in demand.

And if body language means anything – you can tell from the second photo that Jack/John loves his step-mom, and is very comfortable with her. That is the most important thing.

- Ella on April 3rd, 2009

Cute pics.
Bridget is the mother and Giselle respects that, that doesn’t mean she should love him any less.

It looks like all the parties involved have put the kid’s interest first, it’s just the tabloids that need the drama and some people on the outside who can’t let go and make it about themselves.

- Tam on April 3rd, 2009

Yeah it’s hard for a mother to see her kid(s) with step parents but I was very involved in a divorce in the past few years and more than anything, the kids’ mom was happy that they were comfortable. So she doesn’t like the woman (she actually despises her), that’s fine, but the main concern is her kids.

In this case, I think that it’s clear that John/Jack’s happy and that’s all that matters.

- Natasha on April 3rd, 2009

“If your child has a step-parent, do you want that person to treat/love your child as a “step-child” or do you want them to treat/love your baby just the way they would treat their own.”

Love my child but understand that you are not his mother. You can get a divorce and be out my kids life, but I will forever have a bond with that child. Having a good relationship with a step-child is not like saying ‘he’s mine from the first day’. Its a cute and sweet thing now until the kid gets older and big parental decisions have to be made in which I think a step-parent should have next to NO input. Then what? Saying a child is yours encompasses a lot of choices and responsibility. Plus we don’t even know what kind of relationship Bridget has with Giselle, but judging from ppl(which is usually very reliable) not the type where her saying that is appropriate.

It doesn’t have anything to do with my feelings. Its just a matter of knowing your role. A step-mother is not a doppelganger if the biological mom is fulfilling her duties. Being a mom is a privilege and considering he spends most of his time with Bridget, and she has to deal with the good and the bad..it just strikes me as being very disrespectful.

“It’s not like because somebody else delivered him, that’s not my child,” said the supermodel, 28. “I love him the same way as if he were mine. I already feel like he’s my son, from the first day.”

Really???

- Bieta on April 3rd, 2009

I wonder how the commenters criticizing Gisele would feel if Gisele said “John is a wonderful little boy but he’s not my child so it’s hard to feel close to him”. These same people would be going bizerk. They would have something bad to say about her either way.

- LolaCola on April 3rd, 2009

“Most single mom’s I know would have yank their Ex’s into court. It’s great that she can see past this and put little jack’s interest first…it’s nice that she let them take jack to costa rico.”

Yanked him into court for what? The courts don’t look kindly upon frivolous lawsuits. I don’t think a judge would be amused at all if a mother filed a lawsuit to complain that “My child’s stepmother made a remark I didn’t like.

And what do you mean “it’s nice that she let him take Jack to Costa Rica”? Tom is Jack’s father. Father’s have rights too, although to read a lot of the comments on this site about this family you would think that they didn’t.

It’s beyond me why every time there is a post about anyone in this family there are people on here who go postal over every tiny little thing.

- Grace on April 3rd, 2009

Well said Haylo. I have never understood the people on here who say that is must be so hard for Bridget to see another woman holding her child. Really? Seriously? I wonder if the situation was reversed and Bridget was in a relationship with a man who spent time with Jack if people who be feeling equally sorry for Tom that “another man is holding his child.”

I would hope that when Bridget sees these pictures she doesn’t think “I’m upset that another woman is holding my child” because that would be selfish and totally self-involved at the expense of her child. I would hope she would look at that and thing, “I”m glad my child is having fun and being well cared for even if I can’t be there with him.” I think the people who are so focused on it being all about Bridget rather than all about Jack are very showing some serious immaturity.

- Grace on April 3rd, 2009

Aw! This is the first time I’ve ever seen Tom with his son and it really improves my opinion of him

I have to say in the beginning I didn’t like Tom or Gisele very much. It seemed as if he dumped Bridget for Gisele AND she was prgnant! I thought the two of them were just a fling and I thought it was crazy to get out off one long term relationship only to jump right into another. I really liked him with Bridget but time moves forward and he and Gisele seem to be in it for the long haul and I’m sure a beautiful sexy lady like Bridget has moved on as well.

I only read excerpts of what Gisele said but I didn’t see anything wrong with her comments. She has a right to speak her mind. Its a print interview and words don’t always come across the way the person intended. As a mother I would appreciate the fact that the “other” woman loved my child the way Gisele said she loves John. I know a few women who feel the opposite and hate the fact that there is a child in the picture that isn’t their own. I think Bridget’s “friends” were more out of line commenting on this situation than Gisele. I thought “how is their commenting on this personal matter any more appropriate then Gisele?”

- T on April 3rd, 2009

i’ve never thought tom was particularly attractive, but that second pic is HOT!

- Sara on April 3rd, 2009

I guess to me, her saying he’s like her own is her saying i’m like his mother…and to me its completely unfair and a little angering imagining I’d have to split my role as mom. Being a step-mom is cool(i’m preparing for that role myself) but I wouldn’t fool myself into thinking i’m the kids mom no matter how much I love the kids.I take the role as being almost an aunt or a cool friend. Tho i feel deeply for the kiddos.

- Bieta on April 3rd, 2009

I found Gisele’s comments to be utterly ridiculous. I think Gisele quote should be divided into two parts. The first past way okay: I love John as if he was my own. Okay, fine. The second part I take great offense to, the comment about how she feels that John is hers 100%. Gisele-John is NOT your child. If Gisele and Tom get divorced, she mostly likely will never see that child again. Gisele’s comments would have been appropriate if John were her adopted son but he is not her biological son and he is not her adopted son.

If I were Bridget I would be greatly offended, I pretty sure she did not know her son had another mother. Last time she checked, Gisele name was not on the birth certificate.

Given Gisele’s comments, this picture really bothers. God knows, what Gisele is saying to that boy given her belief that she thinks he is hers. Has she said negative things about Bridget, a woman who has never met. Has she asked little Johnny to call her “mommy” because that who she think she is. Gisele should be ashamed herself. Just because she plays “mom” every few weeks does not make you his mother.

Does she expect little Johnny to share Mother’s Day with her because she considers herself a mother. Bridget needs to watch out-Gisele is trying to steal her son’s heart.

- Di on April 3rd, 2009

From what I read she stated that she knows John has a mother and she isn’t trying to take away from that. How more politically correct could she have been?
I agree with an earlier poster that there is a double standard here. If Bridget’s boyfriend or husband had said the same thing we would’ve probably been all “ohh and aah” about it…

To some Gisele is the “homewrecker” and nothing she does or says will satisfy certain people.

- T on April 3rd, 2009

Di I really don’t think it’s that serious. While I do believe Gisele’s intentions were good, I think what she was trying to say came out all wrong. There’s no such thing as too many people loving a child.

What concerns me more is that fact that both Bridget and Tom have remained quite quiet publicly from the pregnancy announcement until now, and I think that is how it should be with a layered situation such as this. I don’t think it’s Gisele’s place to make comments to the media – even if she means well – when the parents clearly prefer to keep family matters within the family.

- Brandi on April 3rd, 2009

“God knows, what Gisele is saying to that boy given her belief that she thinks he is hers. Has she said negative things about Bridget, a woman who has never met. Has she asked little Johnny to call her “mommy” because that who she think she is.”

Di: Gisele did not say she thinks he is hers. She acknowledged that he has a mother. There was no point in her statement where she said she thought she was his mother. And you’re certainly making a huge leap from a person saying they love a child as if they were her own to assuming that she would badmouth the child’s mother. The one has nothing to do with the other, so I’m not sure why you’re even bringing that up.

Good grief there are some people on here who are awfully hypersensitive considering they don’t even know any of the 4 people involved in this situation.

- Daisy on April 3rd, 2009

My step-mother says that very same thing about me whenever the subject comes up and it makes me feel great! She always tells people that I felt like her own daughter and I was 13 when she came into the picture…John is a baby. I’m so proud of my extended mother-daughter relationship. My biological mother never felt shafted by our relationship because she and all of us knew who was number 1 to me.

She is stating how she feels and its so petty of people to disect her comments. Let’s be glad that she feels that way at all

No one was there when this interview happened so whose to know how her words were spoken. Besides this is the 1st that I’ve ever read her even mention John.

- Tearra on April 3rd, 2009

“If Bridget’s boyfriend or husband had said the same thing we would’ve probably been all “ohh and aah” about it…”

If he said what she said and Tom took care of John most of the time. I doubt it. When both parents are in the picture, I think the comment toward either sex would be annoying.

and why is it that a person cannot comment on someone without having to dislike the person?? Or it having to be about gender.

Gisele is a girl after my own heart. She’s Brasiliera , she’s honest and she can play volleyball. I usually like her. She seems nice girl. However coming from the perspective of a step-parent(practically), her comment to me wasn’t understandable..and to blame it on immaturity or selfishness is a cop out. No one has said how dare she LOVE HIM, i’ve only heard to say “he is mine” was inappropriate.

- Bieta on April 3rd, 2009

“My biological mother never felt shafted by our relationship because she and all of us knew who was number 1 to me”

Thats exactly the point.

- Bieta on April 3rd, 2009

well, to be fair, giselle HAS been there from day one…she and tom were dating before jack was born, and she’s been a part of his entire life…as to posters who have said that step-parents should have no voice in how to raise a child, because they might get divorced from the child’s parent, i have to disagree…i have an excellent relationship with my mother’s ex-husband, along with his new(er) wife…if my father and stepmother were ever to divorce, i would still maintain my relationship with her. kids, especially the younger they are, don’t really understand labels, they just understand love. as long as giselle recognizes the fact he has a mother (which, from her statements, she does), she is, in my opinion, not overstepping any bounds…

- ooji on April 3rd, 2009

Like another poster said, maybe what Gisele said came out wrong. Maybe she didn’t realize how it would sound until it came out of her mouth. Do to that face, I can see both sides of this. (I am a nanny. And with a full-time nanny job, you spend more time than the parents most of the time.) I have loved ALL of the children with all of my heart. I would die for them. (One child I was with for over a year. They have since moved out of state and I still keep in touch with them. I even went to Houston and spent 4 days with them, specifically to see them!) That probably has made the parents more comfortable leaving their children with me. But I would NEVER say that I felt like they were my child from day 1 or that I had given birth to them. That would be beyond disresptful to the mother. So I can see how Gisele might feel, but I would have phrased the comment differently. And as others have said, a child can never have too many people love them. I’m glad that Jack has as many as he has!

- pippi777 on April 3rd, 2009

Considering the fact that Gisele has been around since the day John/Jack was born I think that it’s only right that she feels like a mother to him – as she should. I would be hurt if my step-dad said he didn’t feel like a father to me. I totally get what she was trying to say…maybe it came out wrong when she said it. I’m sure she wouldn’t want to step on Bridget’s toes. I guess you should be punished for loving a child…ok.

- ljc on April 4th, 2009

For me, it’s all in how Jack looks with Gisele. He’s happy and secure and that’s what counts. For me, the more parents the merrier. Everyone knows that Jack has a mother and Gisele herself said she respects Bridget’s role. It’s about the kid and thank God there are some people out there who can get over themselves and focus on the child.

Yay for them.

- Felicia on April 4th, 2009

“It’s not like because somebody else delivered him, that’s not my child,” said the supermodel, 28. “I love him the same way as if he were mine. I already feel like he’s my son, from the first day.”

Oh my god really? That’s not fine, if I were Gisele I would never said that again its like you need to have some respect for the child’s mother, its not like Bridget only delivered him she’s his mom and Gisele is his father’s wife and she can have a great relationship with him and love him very much but she isn’t his mom, so maybe she could say it different or with some other words

- Mariana on April 4th, 2009

I have read all of these comments; and i haven’t seen a single one that is saying that Bundchen should not love John. Or that she should be punished for having deep affection for him.

So really if that is the only comeback I think a new one is in order. One that actually combats the opposing opinion. At least some people have admitted that the passage could have been misinterpreted.

of which, I feel I should mention I have none. I just find labeling people you don’t know self or immature parents or complete nuts to be a juvenile way of getting your point across.

-Janey

- Jane on April 4th, 2009

I think it’s great that Giselle feels so much love towards Jack; how awful would it be if she didn’t have any affection for him?? What strikes me as odd is how many pictures I have seen of Tom and Giselle with Jack out in public, and the fact that she is giving pretty in-depth statements about him. Bridget has made it it a point to keep Jack out of the spotlight. She introduced him in OK Magazine when he was born, but since then, I can count on 1 hand how many times I have seen paparazzi pictures of the two of them together, even though Bridget has him most of the time. And I know that people are saying that Tom and Giselle are more famous, but ever since Bridget announced she was pregnant, the media has taken quite the interest in her, and I really think that she probably does have to really work to keep Jack out of the spotlight.
I know that Tom and Giselle are targets for the paparazzi, but look at the Jolie-Pitts. They’re one of the most famous families in the world, yet for how famous they are they are pretty good at keeping their kids shielded from the paparazzi, most of the time. It’s not like there are new pictures every day, or every other day, like there are with Suri Cruise.
Obviously I don’t know Tom or Giselle, but personally, I get the impression that they are a lot less concerned with keeping Jack away from the media, which I find really disrespectful to Bridget’s wishes. Her wanting Jack kept out of the limelight as much as possible is not an unreasonable wish.

- alice jane on April 4th, 2009

Also exactly the point is that my step mother says the same things as Gisele an no one takes offense.

Final stance for me is good for you Gisele he feels like yours and that is a BEAUTIFUL thing. Whoever doesn’t like just has to deal with it

- Tearra on April 4th, 2009

“I could not imagine seeing my ex’s wife holding my child.”

I would LOVE to see my child’s step-mother holding him! I want my child to be loved.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

I want to make three additional points. All of the Giselle supporters keeping mentioning that Gisele stated that she respects the fact that John has a mother but does she really. If she really respected Bridget and her role in HER son’s life she would never have said something so hurtful and disrespectful. Bridget deserves an immediate apology. I can imagine how difficult is must be for Bridget having some other woman claiming her child as her own. After all, all she did was carry John for 9 months without the father by her side and taken on the role of being a single parent. Bridget has carried herself with dignity and class and Giselle up until this quote had as well.

Secondly, everyone keeps saying that Gisele has been there from day one, but has she?. I don’t remember reading any reports about her being at the hospital for the birth. Tom was obviously there but Giselle was not. If I remember, John was born shortly before or during the football season so Tom’s time with him was obviously limited. The first picture of Giselle and John was taken months after his birth so it is not as if Giselle and Bridget have been sharing parenting duties. Gisele is NOT Bridget’s equal when it comes to John. Tom is spending alot of time with John now because his football season ended early because of injury, but make no mistake, Bridget is the child’s primary physical guardian and Giselle and Tom are not nearly as involved as the pictures may appear.

Lastly, if the situation was reversed as Bridget’s new husband was claiming John as his own, I would still be offended. I feel that in situations such as these, problems arise when the step parent does not respect the biological parent’s role in the child’s life especically if the biological parent has primary physical custody.

- Di on April 4th, 2009

“Also exactly the point is that my step mother says the same things as Gisele an no one takes offense”

The exactly the point is, even tho she says that and you like it you said yourself there is a clear distinction with who is number 1 to you. She became your step mom at 13, John knows this woman since birth. I’m surprised you can’t see how the line between step-mom and mom can become murky and how if those lines become too blurred it could be deemed disrespectful. If John grows up knowing Bridget is his only mother than its cool, but her comment depending on interpretation can raise questions.

As a step-mom, I love those kids. I do everything for them everyday and you know whaat? there mom isn’t even the greatest. But she’s still there mom and I wouldn’t even want to look like i was interfering with that because they are both under 5 and can get the wrong impression. So when they call me mama, i correct them. When they ask me certain things i direct them to their mom.

- Bieta on April 4th, 2009

I think Gisele’s comment came out wrong because English is not her first language. I will give her the benefit of the doubt because she seems to really care for Tom and Bridget’s son.

- Chris on April 4th, 2009

“Or that she should be punished for having deep affection for him.”

Really Jane? Because the comment about hauling Tom into court certainly sounded to me like one of the posters thought that Gisele/Tom should be punished for the comment.

“So really if that is the only comeback I think a new one is in order. One that actually combats the opposing opinion. At least some people have admitted that the passage could have been misinterpreted.”

Who was using that as their comeback? All I see are some people pointing out that Gisele’s comment wasn’t such a horrible thing. That does not mean that they think it was great. It merely means that they don’t think there is any reason to get all hysterical and imply that they should be hauled into court, or to start to making accusations about how Gisele might be badmouthing Bridget to Jack.

I’m not really sure what you’re trying to convey with the combat comment since there are quite a few comments on here that rather effectively lay out logical reasons for disagreeing with those who are hysterically jumping down Gisele’s throat over one little comment.

- Grace on April 4th, 2009

You know, I don’t see the big deal. First off if you think about it, english isn’t Gisele’s first language. The translation might have been off you know? Also I think its great she sees Jack as her own. My stepmother always introduced me and my brother as her daughter and son and I dont see the big deal in that. She helped raise me you know? Plus someone else said you can tell by the pictures how comfortable Jack is with Gisele. Look at Demi Moore, Bruce Wills and Ashton Kutcher. The girls refer to Ashton as their second dad or whatever. Its not a big deal

- Hannah on April 4th, 2009

“If she really respected Bridget and her role in HER son’s life she would never have said something so hurtful and disrespectful. Bridget deserves an immediate apology”

Have you ever said something that came out the wrong way? Because I sure have. So I’m not going to rake someone over the coals for saying something that sounds like it has good intentions but doesn’t seem to have been worded well. Especially since I belive English is not Gisele’s first language. And how do you know she hasn’t apologlized. She very well could have. Perhaps she should apologize, and then when she’s done Bridget’s friends should apologize to her as well for dragging this into the media as well.

“Secondly, everyone keeps saying that Gisele has been there from day one, but has she?. I don’t remember reading any reports about her being at the hospital for the birth. Tom was obviously there but Giselle was not. If I remember, John was born shortly before or during the football season so Tom’s time with him was obviously limited. The first picture of Giselle and John was taken months after his birth so it is not as if Giselle and Bridget have been sharing parenting duties. Gisele is NOT Bridget’s equal when it comes to John. Tom is spending alot of time with John now because his football season ended early because of injury, but make no mistake, Bridget is the child’s primary physical guardian and Giselle and Tom are not nearly as involved as the pictures may appear.”

I don’t believe that anyone meant the she was literally there at the hospital. I believe they meant that she was in his life since the beginning. And tabloid pictures aren’t exactly the most accurate measure of whether someone has spent time with a child. I didn’t see any pictures of Bridget with Jack until he was almost a month old. Am I to assume that she never spent time with him up until that point?

- Grace on April 4th, 2009

Grace:

“Really Jane? Because the comment about hauling Tom into court certainly sounded to me like one of the posters thought that Gisele/Tom should be punished for the comment.”

“It it nice to finally see a photo of Tom interacting with his son. I have a lot of respect for Bridget for not going Postal on Tom because of Gisele’s comments. Most single mom’s I know would have yank their Ex’s into court.”

The person wasn’t suggesting that’s what she should have done, or that its the correct thing to do, just what a lot of other moms would do. Plus it’s true…Why would they go to court?? On what grounds?? No idea. That to me is immature.

“Only selfish people more concerned with their own feelings rather than the welfare of the child would object to those comments. ”

“I think some of you people are complete nuts”.

There are other comments mixed in but they’re all basically “only a seflish immature yadada” type deals.

What I’m basically saying, is the quote could easily be interpreted in different ways. Nobody seems to want to acknowledge that watching another woman with your child can be difficult. If anyone voices it, they’re selfish and don’t want their kid to be loved. That’s the only response I’ve seen “I want my child to be loved” when nobody on the other side of the ‘debate’ is saying they don’t want their child loved.

I have to applaud bieta because she juggles the step-mom thing quite nicely. lol

- Janey on April 4th, 2009

ohhh and all my comments are sans Di, cause to be honest not sure what shes talking about…its a lot of speculation.

- Janey on April 4th, 2009

“If she really respected Bridget and her role in HER son’s life she would never have said something so hurtful and disrespectful. Bridget deserves an immediate apology. I can imagine how difficult is must be for Bridget having some other woman claiming her child as her own.”

How do you know it was hurtful and disrespectful to Bridget? Giselle clearly stated that Bridget was number one and she did not want to usurp her role, but that she loved John as her own. I see that as actually BEING respectful.

Secondly, Giselle did not claim John as her own, she said she FELT like he was her own. She clearly stated that Bridget was his mother.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

“Nobody seems to want to acknowledge that watching another woman with your child can be difficult”

It’s not that no one wants to acknowledge the difficulties involved in the situations. It’s that some of us are having a hard time figuring out why that particular aspect of the situation would be difficult. Why is it hard to see your child being loved and taken care of by their step mother? I have known many parents who are jealous when others have a close relationship with their child (step parents, nannies, relatives) and I do think it’s incredibly immature. And I have known many parents who are the exact opposite, who rejoice in their child having an extra person who loves them and I greatly admire and respect those people for being mature enough to see things that way. Plus I find it odd that so many people are projecting their own feelings onto Bridget with the comments like “She must be so hurt by that.” That truly surprises me that there are so many people who think they know how someone that they don’t even know feels. We have no idea how she feels.

- Grace on April 4th, 2009

I feel like a lot of people(myself included) didn’t see the entire passage. The people article is a bit misleading. My sister just showed me the whole comment on dlisted and admittedly its not as bad as I thought.

http://www.dlisted.com/node/31364

If anyone cares to read.

My original opinion on step-motherhood however still stays the same tho. No matter how much I feel for these kids, no matter how much love I show them and how close I feel to them…I’ll never be there mom. I don’t dwell on it, cause it makes me a little sad…I just don’t want to cross that boundary cause I’m a step-parent. I feel uncomfortable telling them what to do because; tho I do feel on the same page with the mother most days, I could easily do something one day she doesn’t agree with; and damage the relationship she has with me and the father.Its a no win.

Janey, lol I needed that.

- Bieta on April 4th, 2009

Grace:

I don’t have kids. For good reason, cause I’m not mature enough at this point to have kids. So when I imagine seeing a step-mother with my kids, being photographed as this happy family all over the place…while I’m a single mom having to do it all on my own…yeah at this stage of my life I’d be pretty peeved. Or at least I feel peeved thinking about it right now. Maybe one day i’ll be able to look at it like “oh yeah one extra person to love my kid! wooo” “one love!!”…

but not today.

- Janey on April 4th, 2009

I do not mean to nitpick but I am looking at Gisele’s quote right now this is what she said: “I understand that he has a mom, and I respect that, but to me it’s not like because somebody else delivered him, that’s not my child. I feel it is, 100 percent. ”

The words speak for themselves. Gisele’s English may not be great but the quote makes it clear that she feels that John is 100% her child. If you agree with her quote fine but don’t make it seem like it she said something else.

Gisele’s statement is controversial because she basically said that she considers Tom and Bridget’s son to be her son one hundred percent and in my opinion and in the opinon of others that is wrong. Do I know if Bridget is offended or upset? Of course not, but I believe many women would be at that notion.

It seems like in Giselle’s mind, John has two moms: the woman who gave birth to him, Bridget and she is the other mom. Secondly, I found the whole tone of the quote so condescending. I had to laugh when I read the part where she said “I want him to have a great relationship with his mom, because that’s important, but I love him the same way as if he were mine.” I am sure Bridget is relieved to know that Gisele wants her and John to have a good relationship with her. LOL. Who does this woman think she is? Oh I forgot, she thinks she is John’s mother. She’s been married Tom for less than two months and she’s already starting to call the shots.

- Di on April 4th, 2009

Why is Bridget commenting on this at all? She is going to suck the child right into the sh*tstorm of the media. She should know that the media comes with the territory and shine it on. This is a crazy world, and you have to pick your battles, right?

- sat on April 4th, 2009

^ Bridget didn’t comment on anything.

- Brandi on April 4th, 2009

Di, you are nitpicking and blowing everything out of proportion. Who said she is trying to call the shots? And what is wrong with her saying she wants John to have a good relationship with his mother? I took that as her way of saying she didn’t want to cause problems in the mother son relationship and that she tried to respect that relationship.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

I think the true strength here is that Bridget doesn’t show her sadness or anger in seeing pictures like these because maybe she does get emotional. Sometimes it’s hard to see the man you love/loved easily find someone else while you’re the one tha has to give your potential mates a background check. While Giselle probably meant her comments in being nice, I think the true disrespect is even speaking on it. The few times Bridget has lightly spoken about it, she reveals how difficult it is but doesn’t bash Tom in doing so; I think her comments are just directed toward the emotions that go into it. I think it’s great that Jack has loving step-parent, but Jack has a mother and a father. No matter if Giselle is part of Jack’s life, she is not the dominant parent and should respect Bridget in not making comments about Jack and how she feels. I think the biggest thing that knocked off points for me is how Giselle expressed how she felt about the situation when it first arose. There is a certain level of confidentiality that both parents have upheld and she crossed the line there. Obviously, English isn’t her first language but that doesn’t mater, she shouldn’t say anything at all.

- hcecilia on April 4th, 2009

Di,

While I understand where you are coming from, I think that you are reading a lot into this. I think who said that knowing how the words are said makes a big difference. I’ve kinda chosen to just let it go, because Bridget hasn’t made a comment..and having to be a single mom..I’m sure she’s a tough cookie and can handle he situation just fine. If you’ve dealt with this personally I can see where you’re coming from, but it does sound like a lot of projection.

–Elżbieta

- Bieta on April 4th, 2009

hcecilia, that was very well put! I’m surprised more people haven’t criticized Giselle for talking about her feelings on the situation when it first arose rather than criticizing Giselle for expressing her love for her step-son.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

I think that English is Gisele’s second language. The comments she made may seem inappropriate to some, but they could be taken out of context because Portuguese is her first language.

- Stepha on April 4th, 2009

If Gisele loves John as much as she claims she should leave any incendiary comments (non-intentional or otherwise) regarding Jack out of her media interviews. I admire Bridget for not commenting on Gisele’s statements.

- Erica on April 4th, 2009

Gisele is fluent in English.

- Elle on April 4th, 2009

It’s so nice to see such a Beautiful looking family on the beach.
I know my step-mother loves me she would take a bullet for me. She considers me her daughter. What people need to understand just because Jack didn’t come from her womb that this little bit hasn’t captured her heart.

Sometimes the hardest thing for people to do is to take someone that is not their “own” and make them their own. I applaud Giesel for saying that Jack is her son and if she and Tom have children that she would love them equally. The way Seal loves Leni.

- Sage on April 4th, 2009

THANK YOU; haylo!

- kate on April 4th, 2009

I think all three of them deserve some credit and not only Bridget like you all seem to think. If it would be the other way around and Bridget hat a new husband and he would be as devoted as Gisele you would all be gushing how great he is. You’re all like vultures trying to pick everything apart and basing your views on one comment made by Gisele. English is not her native language so maybe she didn’t mean her comment to sound so unsensitiv. It happens to me too when I speak English. Unless she keeps saying thing like that just cut her some slack.
I think all three are making the absolute best for Jack out of an unideal situation! BRAVO.

- lennie on April 4th, 2009

English is my husband’s second language and although his English is fluent and many people think he is English he can still say some things which come out a different way from which he intended. It is my native language and I do it all the time.

I can’t believe this Gisele thing is getting so much attention. Things are taken out of context in magazines. It happens all the time. She knows she is not the mother, everyone know’s who the baby’s mother is. I’m guessing what she meant was she loves him like he were her own child and I’m sure lots of step-parents would say that about their step-children.

- Lara on April 4th, 2009

This has probably been said already (I haven’t had chance to read through all the comments yet, will do later) but Gisele should be absolutely ashamed of herself for what she has said about that little boy. She can love him, she can care for him, but he is NOT hers and her comments (assuming they were reported correctly) were offensive, arrogant, and showing a blatent disregard for the feelings of the child’s mother. She clearly thinks a lot of herself. The way she has conducted herself over the past few weeks (with her comments about Jack being a wake up call as well as this latest round of rubbish) is shameful. Marrying a child’s father does not make you a mother and the title of step-mother is too quickly given out. It should be earned. And with the disrespect she has shown to Bridget, it is clearly a title that Gisele is not yet mature enough for. I’m sorry for the rant CBB, this just makes me so angry.

- Alex on April 4th, 2009

After the whole scandal when Bridget got pregnant, then the recent sniping over Giselle’s remarks about being a “mom” to Jack, it is nice to see that Bridget and Tom are able to work together and enable Jack to spend time with his father, especially out of the USA and with his new step-mum and her side of the family. They all have to work together to raise Jack. Just like Cynthia Nixon said in that earlier post, the more parents the better. It truly takes a village to raise a child–not just a mother and father.

- eternalcanadian on April 4th, 2009

Let me just clarify my comments. I don’t believe for a moment that Gisele should not be allowed to love and care for Jack. She should be. But, and it is a very big but, she is not his mother, she is his father’s wife and the stepmum. I’m willing to accept that something may have either been reported incorrectly, or lost in translation or whatever the case may be. But whatever the exact comments were, they clearly were pointed. Perhaps Gisele harbours some resentment over the way things happened, Jack came along at a time when she was all loved up and blew a hole right through that, I don’t know. It just seems like there are some residual hard feelings there. I don’t mean to offend anyone with my comments, I just don’t feel that this is a situation to be applauded at all. Love the baby, Gisele, but don’t proclaim to be his mother. Those comments do not need to be out there because Jack is not old enough to wonder how much he is loved, and when he is, you can say it in private, not make public service announcements that could offend Jack’s mum. She could’ve just said ‘I love him like he’s my own’ and have stopped there, not said something along the lines of ‘just because someone else gave birth doesn’t mean that he’s not mine’. That is offensive because it implies a disregard for the fact that something came in between of someone giving birth and Gisele being around him. Oh, who was that person again? Oh, that’s right, it was MUMMY.

- Alex on April 4th, 2009

WOW. I didn’t realize there were 4 adults involved in this situation! Bridget, Tom, Giselle and Di. From all of Di’s comments you would think she is personaly involved. You can’t speculate on something you have ZERO knowledge about. I applaud Giselle for loving Jack as her own. I grew up with a truly wicked step-mother and a step-father who barely aknowledged me. I wish I could have had loving step parents, so I think Jack is a lucky little boy to have such loving people in his life.

- Mavs2980 on April 4th, 2009

Do you people think People magazine will print the “friend’s” comments without passing it by Bridget first? The comment is Bridget’s indirect way of responding. Celebs do it all the time, they have “sources” or “friends” give a comment from the inside, especially to People magazine.
Giselle says she loves the kid and that’s the most important thing. Funny that people want her response to him to be strained.

- Penny on April 4th, 2009

It amazes me how eager some of you are to hypothesize about the motives of someone you have never even met. In reading over the comments — twice — it strikes me that nobody who is critical of Gisele has based that criticism on her affection for John; I think everyone agrees that it’s a good thing. It’s the degree and manner in which she’s claimed that affection. It’s the ‘but’ part of her statement that troubles me the most…because it diminishes the sincerity of the first part. ‘I understand that he has a mom, and I respect that, BUT.’ There should be no ‘but’ there. To then follow that up with ‘I feel it is [my child], 100 percent’ is a slap in the face to birth mothers everywhere. Sorry.

Sorry, Gisele lovers, there are a million and one ways to say ‘I love my stepson’ without saying he’s ’100 percent’ YOURS. Anyone who pretends otherwise is lying to themselves.

Thank you, Di, for printing the full quote.

- Julia on April 4th, 2009

Gisele was out of line. It’s good she loves Jack, but Bridget is his mom. Part of being a good step-parent is not stepping on the toes of the other party. Gisele needs to grow up.

- stephanie on April 4th, 2009

Personally, I think that it’s great that Gisele wants to be an active participant in John’s life. She is his stepmom and it’s good that she should be a part of his life in a positive way. My concern is that she has never met Bridget and I find it hard to believe that Tom, Gisele and Bridget can positively co-parent a child when they haven’t all met.

I think Gisele meant well, but her comments came out wrong.

- Mary-Helen on April 4th, 2009

I really do not understand why so many people are so angry at Gisele.
I believe any sensitive person will realise that she said what she said with the best intentions, and although she is a spokesperson for some brands, perhaps she doesn´t express herself so perfectly when it´s her deepest feelings she is talking about.
I don´t think she was trying to claim John/Jack as her own, as if Bridget did not mattered in the big picture.
Seriously, I have a strong feeling that Gisele does not have a mean bone in her body.

And I also think there is a lot of hipocrisy involved in many comments I´ve been reading, because it seems like:
a) whatever she says, she will be criticized for either loving the kid too much or not caring about him at all.
b) and if she does indeed love him a lot, like she seems to, it´s acceptable to feel it but not to say it?

At least she is being honest!

And come on, of course there will more photos taken of John/Jack when he is with Tom and Gisele than Bridget. She is not as famous as they are. Paps chase Tom and Gisele down! They cannot avoid being photographed with John/Jack most of the times.

I understand that for Bridget, after losing the man she probably thought she was going to marry, seeing her/their son getting so attached to the woman her ex chose to marry instead of her, must be a very uncomfortable, even painful experience.
And as a mother the fears of being replaced… these are things mothers go through all the time.

But I am sure that Bridget is smarter than that, and knows deep down inside that she will not be replaced, John/Jack knows who her mother is.

Or perhaps he is now starting to think that he has two mothers.

If so, is it so bad?

Every child should be so lucky to be so loved!

- Ana G. on April 4th, 2009

This whole thing has been blown out of proportion by Giselle, Bridget and her friends. Let it just peace out, for goodness sakes. I wonder what Tom thinks about this? Don’t these ladies actually care about Jack to the degree where they shouldn’t care about these things and just care that Jack is loved?

- Silvermouse on April 4th, 2009

I thought Gisele’s comments were a back-handed swipe at Bridget. Like one those…I’ll be the better woman…type comments. Yeah right. If you were the better woman, you’d keep Bridget’s name out of your mouth. Saying she wants Bridget to have a good relationship with Jack…, whatever dude. She’s needs to stay in her lane. Bridget knows how the drive.

- Magenta on April 4th, 2009

She didn’t say he was 100% hers, she said she FELT like he was 100% hers.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

What Bridget allowed her friends to tell People magazine is that she doesn’t like her son being photographed as much as he is when he’s with Gisele. I didn’t read anywhere that Bridget resents Gisele’s love and affection for Jack. If I as a mother let it be known to my ex that I’d prefer our child not be made fodder for the media (interviews about him, pictures of him, etc.) then I’d sure as **** expect him and his new wife to respect my feelings. Especially since Bridget appears to have primary custody of Jack, and for sure spent the first year of his life as basically the sole parent on the scene. Geez, folks. Nobody is the hero or villian here, but I think the boy’s mother deserves all deference.

- Lauren on April 4th, 2009

I dont understand people who say ‘Bridget is so good for letting them take jack to costa rica’ so he should..he is his father. As for Giselle she obviously cares and loves Jack which is great i think anyone who had a problem with a child being close to their step parent is obviosuly a very selfish person, who cares about the comments Giselle made? the little guy is happy what more to this situation matters?

- Chan on April 4th, 2009

because her allowing him to take him out of country is very trusting.. i did not allow my ex husband and his 2nd, 3rd and 4th wife to take my son out of state… now that he is looking at wife number 5 and my son is 18 and 6’2 i have no problem with it..and i still thing that bridget is the bigger person here and i can speak from experience on the you can call me mommy thing..my son like is said is 18 and still remembers #2 trying to convince him to call her mommy… and like he said..she was not his mom and my 2nd husband of 15 years.. he refers to him as buddy.. and that is also what all of his friends called my husband to… even though now he will tell you he was the best “dad” he ever had growing up and has thanked us for that… time will tell..i promise you that…. and in our case it was very much worth the wait to see that little boy grow into a fine young man.

- melissa on April 4th, 2009

Ana G: I know I stand by stance that Gisele shouldn’t make comments. It’s not a means to if she’s loving Jack too much or not, it’s the comment respect to Bridget being his dominant parent (forget the biological aspect). When Jack was born and throughout her pregnancy, Bridget could have easily marked up her celebrity points by being open about the situation. Yes, Gisele and Tom are more famous, but there are ways to keep the amount of photos at a minimum. Take Nicole Richie, for example. Even after the whole Paris friendship break, she was taken photos of all the time. It wasn’t until she started dating Joel, and especially after she got pregnant, the amount of pictures taken of her has greatly lessened. She’s made herself less relevant to them. Giving open interviews about controversial situations sparks up the media. Besides, Gisele and Tom are hardly ever photographed before they were married – especially with Jack. I’m not saying it’s because they don’t spend time with him, but it’s because they made themselves irrelevant.

- hcecilia on April 4th, 2009

On a side note, Tom gets more hotter every single day. Gisele is one lucky lady – she goes home to Tom every night and is a new ”Mom” to John.

- Linda on April 4th, 2009

“Yes, Gisele and Tom are more famous, but there are ways to keep the amount of photos at a minimum.”

I have NEVER seen Giselle or Tom pose with John. Any time a phottographer has taken a picture of them up close, they cover the child’s face. And it’s really not fair to say there are more pictures of them now that they’re married. They’ve only been married a couple months and they’ve had what, three celebrations since then? Of course there are going to be lots of pictures and papparazi.

- Sam on April 4th, 2009

Wow…this one’s a toughie…On the one hand it would kill me to see my ex and his new wife with my baby but on the other hand I would want to know that my child was completely cared for, especially in a foreign country! I can just imagine the logistics of ” make sure you put sunscreen and his hat on, don’t let him out of your sight near the water”. I don’t think that Gisele’s comments were out of line at all–if I were in the position of being a new parent to someone’s baby I would want to do everything I could to assure them that I was going to treat that child like my own–especially in terms of safety and supervision. I get nervous when my husband takes my kids to the grocery store–it would be crazy to think of him taking them to Costa Rica! Kudos to Bridget for her dignity and grace.

- momof3 on April 4th, 2009

I don’t get it. What was she suposed to say? I hate the kid because I didn’t give birth to him.? People in this country are easily manipulated by the press it’s sad. Bridget’s camp went nuts in the NY Post all of a sudden Gisele is the devil who’s trying to steal Bridget’s kid. From the get go this has been a horrible relationship for Gisele. Imagine dating someone for a few weeks then all of a sudden the entire planet found out his ex is pregnant via a tabloid. Then now you’re being hated by every woman cause you look like you’re standing between him and a reunion with his ex. I’m sure that was a difficult position to be in. I have to say I didn’t give the relationship a chance during all that fiasco, which is why I was surprized they lasted this long, and now are getting married. I guess I was wrong. I think Bridget’s camp has done everthing they could to make people hate Gisele and in a lot of ways they have succeded. It’s sad because people who know and work with Gisele says she’s one of the nicest people.

- nan on April 4th, 2009

Loving stepmom or not, she shouldn’t be making comments to the press about him and should be taking precautions for him not to be photographed since that would seem to comply with Bridget’s wishes. Due the the controversy, it will now be much harder for them to keep him out of the paparazzi’s eye, so Giselle shouldn’t have started it in the first place by using the baby as a PR campaign.

- Stacy on April 4th, 2009

This is in reply to Julia and Di ..

…because it diminishes the sincerity of the first part. ‘I understand that he has a mom, and I respect that, BUT.’ There should be no ‘but’ there. To then follow that up with ‘I feel it is [my child], 100 percent’ is a slap in the face to birth mothers everywhere. Sorry.

Sorry, Gisele lovers, there are a million and one ways to say ‘I love my stepson’ without saying he’s ‘100 percent’ YOURS. Anyone who pretends otherwise is lying to themselves.

Thank you, Di, for printing the full quote.

First of all, I would hope that you actually took the time to read the VF interview in full on their website to better understand how things are being taken out of context.
‘I feel it is [my child], 100 percent’ that Gisele is referring to is .. dare I say it here .. ” her LOVE !!! she is NOT saying John is 100 percent hers, its her love that is 100 percent !!

I have actually had the pleasure of living in Italy for 3 years and while I was able to communicate very well, I know first hand that I was not able to say clearly everything that I wanted to say. Perhaps Gisele should have replied in Portuguese which is her native language from Brazil but then Bridget’s Friend wouldn’t know how to slam Gisele.

Until I am able to read an actual quote from Bridget herself about any of this nonsense then that is all this is .. nonsense.

- EgoMania on April 5th, 2009

Also, for people wondering how come Bridget let Tom and Gisele take John with them to Costa Rica, Bridget is off working in Vancouver. So it looks like this little get away was for everyone’s benefit.

Hmmm, let John go with his dad to a tropical paradise (with appropriate sunscreen and supervision) or go with mom to Vancouver for a work assignment. Yup .. tropical paradise works for me too!

- EgoMania on April 5th, 2009

To me it all comes down to respect. All the adults in this situation need to respect one another. I think Giselle’s comments show a lack of respect for Bridget as John’s mother. One thing that bothered me about the quote was that Gisele referred to Bridget as “somebody” who gave birth to John. Bridget is not just “somebody”. She is a woman who dated Tom for three years. The least Gisele oould do is mention Bridget by name.

I also found it interesting that Gisele has never met Bridget. Now, it is entirely possible that Bridget has no interest in meeting Gisele but it would not it be appropriate for Gisele to introduce herself seeing that she is now John’s step-mother. At some point, Gisele and Bridget will come into contact with each other, but because of Giselle’s unfortunate comments, Bridget may harbor hard feelings toward Gisele.

The important thing to remember is that as much as Gisele may love John as her own, she should not try to replace Bridget as John’s mother because that is where problems may arise.

- Di on April 5th, 2009

I am so glad that Tom is ‘stepping up to the plate’ regarding his son. I am sorry it didn’t work out with Bridget, however..

- Judith on April 5th, 2009

Di, I saw her not mentioning Bridget as a sign of respect, not disrespect. There was no reason to mention Bridget by name. That would just draw more publicity. Maybe Bridget didn’t want to be mentioned by name!

And we don’t know why Bridget and Giselle have never met, so there is no reason to speculate.

Giselle never said she was trying to replace Bridget. She specifically SAID she wasn’t. Why are you trying so hard to get something negative out of this?

- Sam on April 5th, 2009

Please stop saying that Bridget ‘let’ her friends comment to people. They didn’t comment to people, first of all, they commented to US magazine. Us magazine is a tabloid, and tabloids don’t ‘check’ with the stars first. If they did, they wouldn’t be printing how Jennifer Aniston is desperate to be with Brad and whatnot.

Try checking your facts first before claiming what Bridget did or didn’t do.

- Anais on April 5th, 2009

Brandi you are absolutely right, I stand corrected! The anonymous quotes are not directly from Bridget at all.

- sat on April 5th, 2009

When I pasted the quote from VF, I forgot one crucial sentence. Gisele said “I already feel like he’s my son, from the first day”. There you go, Gisele said that she feels that her son knowing full well that his mother is very much present in John’s life.

I was on another website that was talking about this quote and the author, who was an attorney, mentioned that if Tom and Bridget ever got into a custody battle, Bridget could argue that based on Gisele’s comments, Gisele would be guilty of parental alienation i.e, turning the child against his parent. It already seems like she is trying to replace Gisele which would look bad in the eyes of the court.

I have no doubt that once Gisele has her OWN child, she will stop fixating on Bridget’s child because that child will be with her 100% of the time. I have no respect for people who act like Gisele i.e., people who don’t respect the relationship the biological parent has with her child.

- Di on April 5th, 2009

“When I pasted the quote from VF, I forgot one crucial sentence. Gisele said “I already feel like he’s my son, from the first day”.”

Yes, note the words “feel like.” Giselle did not say he is her son, she said he FEELS like her son. Those are her emotions and they are completely natural. I would hope that my son’s step-mother would feel the same way about him.

- Sam on April 5th, 2009

Several years ago, Gisele made a comment to a magazine about how hot Tom Brady was. But she said for her. he may as well be gay, because she did not mess wiht men who were in relationships. Three months later, Tom is out on thoe town with Gisele, while Bridget gets ready to have a baby.Now you tell me how got screwed. I am team Bridget all the way. She has class.

- hannah kate on April 6th, 2009

I know so many single mothers who are still bitter about their relationships with their exes and really mess up the relationship between their children and their father. It is really hard to put feelings aside and be a great parent but I think Bridget is amazing. She trusts Tom to be a good father and lets him take their son on vacation. I have a friend who uses the baby as a pawn and if she is being especially bitter won’t let his father take him out of town. That doesn’t help anything.

Again, good for them!

- txgal on April 6th, 2009

“Several years ago, Gisele made a comment to a magazine about how hot Tom Brady was. But she said for her. he may as well be gay, because she did not mess wiht men who were in relationships. Three months later, Tom is out on thoe town with Gisele, while Bridget gets ready to have a baby.Now you tell me how got screwed.”

Your argument doesn’t make sense. Gisele said she couldn’t mess with a man in a relationship, not that she couldn’t mess with a guy expecting a child. Tom WAS single when Gisele started dating him.

- Sam on April 6th, 2009

19 months is too young, i think, to be without your mum traveling. its just so sad to me.

- cookie on April 6th, 2009

cookie- It’s not like Jack was with strangers! He was with his father and new stepmother!

- CelebBabyLover on April 6th, 2009

anyone remember Britney Spears with kevin’s daughter Kori?

- anne on April 7th, 2009