<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To pose or not to pose &#8212; Readers ask, &#039;Where&#039;s Nahla?&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelebBabyLover</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CelebBabyLover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;sunny- I heard that about the paps sneaking onto to the J-P&#039;s property and taking photos! I understand that they are celebrities, and obviously if they are out in pubilc then they should expect to be photographed. However, the paps taking pictures of them at their private home is definently crossing the line! It is obvious to me that what the paps were after were the first photos of Knox and Vivienne (thank goodness they apparently weren&#039;t outside with the rest of the family. They were most likely sleeping).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From what I&#039;ve heard, one of the pictures they took was of Pax playing in the water, completely naked! That&#039;s just plain disturbing that a pap would want to take a photo of that! Angie and Brad must be absolutly furious!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;..And people ask why they had Shiloh in Namibia! At least then they were able to pretty much avoid the paps all together for the first few weeks after Shi&#039;s birth, as Namibian officals wouldn&#039;t even allow the paps into the country. Only reporters that had offical written permission from Brad and Angie (most likely via their lawyers or reps) to cover the birth were allowed to enter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am guessing that they may have gone to Namibia for this birth as well had Angie not been pregnant with twins. I&#039;m sure they realized that if, heaven forbid, the twins should be born very prematurely, the hospital in Namibia probably wouldn&#039;t have the facilites to care for them (the hospital is actually a pretty nice, modern one, but it is very small, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it doesn&#039;t have a NICU).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just hope that this will put an end to the questions about why the go abroad for the birth of their bio babies!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>sunny- I heard that about the paps sneaking onto to the J-P&#8217;s property and taking photos! I understand that they are celebrities, and obviously if they are out in pubilc then they should expect to be photographed. However, the paps taking pictures of them at their private home is definently crossing the line! It is obvious to me that what the paps were after were the first photos of Knox and Vivienne (thank goodness they apparently weren&#8217;t outside with the rest of the family. They were most likely sleeping).</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, one of the pictures they took was of Pax playing in the water, completely naked! That&#8217;s just plain disturbing that a pap would want to take a photo of that! Angie and Brad must be absolutly furious!</p>
<p>..And people ask why they had Shiloh in Namibia! At least then they were able to pretty much avoid the paps all together for the first few weeks after Shi&#8217;s birth, as Namibian officals wouldn&#8217;t even allow the paps into the country. Only reporters that had offical written permission from Brad and Angie (most likely via their lawyers or reps) to cover the birth were allowed to enter.</p>
<p>I am guessing that they may have gone to Namibia for this birth as well had Angie not been pregnant with twins. I&#8217;m sure they realized that if, heaven forbid, the twins should be born very prematurely, the hospital in Namibia probably wouldn&#8217;t have the facilites to care for them (the hospital is actually a pretty nice, modern one, but it is very small, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it doesn&#8217;t have a NICU).</p>
<p>I just hope that this will put an end to the questions about why the go abroad for the birth of their bio babies!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Gwen Stefani sold Kingston picture to OK magazine for $0.5 mil. At that time baby pic price was lower than now. Gwen and Jennifer are doing similar to paparazzi. Don&#039;t set up but don&#039;t avoid them. Paparazzi who follow them seems to be several people and their target is only one child.  &lt;br /&gt;
While Jolie-Pitts is stalked by nearly 50 paps around their multiple children. They even invaded into their property to take photos. Their price-tag is much higher than other A-list celebs. &lt;br /&gt;
I wish there are only official twins photos released by Brad and Angie and no photos from stalker paparazzi whose akin caused the death of  Diana.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Gwen Stefani sold Kingston picture to OK magazine for $0.5 mil. At that time baby pic price was lower than now. Gwen and Jennifer are doing similar to paparazzi. Don&#8217;t set up but don&#8217;t avoid them. Paparazzi who follow them seems to be several people and their target is only one child.  <br />
While Jolie-Pitts is stalked by nearly 50 paps around their multiple children. They even invaded into their property to take photos. Their price-tag is much higher than other A-list celebs. <br />
I wish there are only official twins photos released by Brad and Angie and no photos from stalker paparazzi whose akin caused the death of  Diana.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaykay</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaykay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Listen i totally with halle berry for not showing the picture of her baby yet. Its not for the attention. Imagine the kid was not even born and yet she received threats I&#039;m not a mom yet but i love kids if someone would be giving threats to any pregnant woman or a kid or me  I&#039;ll go crazy and try to protect them. its understandable that shes scared to show her baby&#039;s pic. Maybe all she needs is spaces to be more comfortable with all this situation here.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Listen i totally with halle berry for not showing the picture of her baby yet. Its not for the attention. Imagine the kid was not even born and yet she received threats I&#8217;m not a mom yet but i love kids if someone would be giving threats to any pregnant woman or a kid or me  I&#8217;ll go crazy and try to protect them. its understandable that shes scared to show her baby&#8217;s pic. Maybe all she needs is spaces to be more comfortable with all this situation here.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I think parents like Gavin Rossdale and Gwen Stefani have the right idea.  Live their lives and if pictures are taken, so be it.  I don&#039;t remember if Kingston was in a photo shoot or not at birth, but in viewing pictures of him now, it&#039;s like seeing the latest emailed pictures to me of my infant niece who lives far away.  It is fun to watch them grow and change.  I am all for the casual pictures, not the set up photo shoots. I would venture to say we will probably see a lot of Halle Berry&#039;s child in the future.  Celebrities have a way of eventually wanting the attention or at least not protesting the attention. Who can you even think of who actually &quot;hides&quot; their children from the public.  I can&#039;t think of anybody.   &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think parents like Gavin Rossdale and Gwen Stefani have the right idea.  Live their lives and if pictures are taken, so be it.  I don&#8217;t remember if Kingston was in a photo shoot or not at birth, but in viewing pictures of him now, it&#8217;s like seeing the latest emailed pictures to me of my infant niece who lives far away.  It is fun to watch them grow and change.  I am all for the casual pictures, not the set up photo shoots. I would venture to say we will probably see a lot of Halle Berry&#8217;s child in the future.  Celebrities have a way of eventually wanting the attention or at least not protesting the attention. Who can you even think of who actually &#8220;hides&#8221; their children from the public.  I can&#8217;t think of anybody.   </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ang</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are there any other celebrity babies you&#039;re still waiting to see photos of?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TORI&#039;S!!! i don&#039;t know what she will do though about introducing her little girl. i luv reading baby introductions-reading about the birth experiences, where it happened, when and how it happened, who was there, how they reacted once they saw the baby-i enjoy reading about it(obviously, otherwise i wouldn&#039;t be here lol). i can understand why halle doesn&#039;t want to do it, but while she&#039;s well-known she&#039;s not of brangelina status. it&#039;s not like nahla will end up on magazine covers every week.halle&#039;s a public person, it&#039;s only natural people r interested in &quot;meeting&quot; her child. i mean,if she didn&#039;t want any focus on her being a parent, she would have lived out her pregnancy in siberia or something.i&#039;ve seen the bump and now i want to see the baby!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Are there any other celebrity babies you&#8217;re still waiting to see photos of?</p>
<p>TORI&#8217;S!!! i don&#8217;t know what she will do though about introducing her little girl. i luv reading baby introductions-reading about the birth experiences, where it happened, when and how it happened, who was there, how they reacted once they saw the baby-i enjoy reading about it(obviously, otherwise i wouldn&#8217;t be here lol). i can understand why halle doesn&#8217;t want to do it, but while she&#8217;s well-known she&#8217;s not of brangelina status. it&#8217;s not like nahla will end up on magazine covers every week.halle&#8217;s a public person, it&#8217;s only natural people r interested in &#8220;meeting&#8221; her child. i mean,if she didn&#8217;t want any focus on her being a parent, she would have lived out her pregnancy in siberia or something.i&#8217;ve seen the bump and now i want to see the baby!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny how people want to throw the Jolie-Pitts into any equation that has to do with celebrities. Maybe there are no offers for Halle&#039;s baby just like Jessica Alba has said she has not received any offers, all celebrities are not equal. Because Angelina has not been seen for 10days, the media have been in a tizzy with all kinds of rumors of birth and names and she is being implored to show her face so the media will be satisfied that she has not had her baby, now I don&#039;t see that much attention being paid to any other pregnant celebrity mom.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some people just want to be critical, most of the celebrities mentioned, the only couple that I know that the money went to charity was Brad and Angelina, so how exactly are they profiting from their children. Have some of you seen pictures of them trying to take their children and mayhem and the crowd that gather within a very short time, it is silly to compare them to any other celebrity right now because no other couple elicit that much interest from the media, public and paparazzi and again if they do not want the paps to profit from their children, I say good for them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t really care to see Halle or any other celebrity baby, I come here to see if there is anything new on the Jolie-Pitt twins and I am ashamed that I am also feeding the huge interest in them.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Funny how people want to throw the Jolie-Pitts into any equation that has to do with celebrities. Maybe there are no offers for Halle&#8217;s baby just like Jessica Alba has said she has not received any offers, all celebrities are not equal. Because Angelina has not been seen for 10days, the media have been in a tizzy with all kinds of rumors of birth and names and she is being implored to show her face so the media will be satisfied that she has not had her baby, now I don&#8217;t see that much attention being paid to any other pregnant celebrity mom.</p>
<p>Some people just want to be critical, most of the celebrities mentioned, the only couple that I know that the money went to charity was Brad and Angelina, so how exactly are they profiting from their children. Have some of you seen pictures of them trying to take their children and mayhem and the crowd that gather within a very short time, it is silly to compare them to any other celebrity right now because no other couple elicit that much interest from the media, public and paparazzi and again if they do not want the paps to profit from their children, I say good for them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really care to see Halle or any other celebrity baby, I come here to see if there is anything new on the Jolie-Pitt twins and I am ashamed that I am also feeding the huge interest in them.  </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiquita</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chiquita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 04:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I am a faithful reader of celebrity Baby Blog.As long as I have been looking at this sight I have never felt compelled to make a comment. I find it funny that people who look at this sight would have such strong comments about how wrong it is for a celebrity partent to have their children&#039;s pictures taken. This sight is here because people like to see the babies. It&#039;s like looking at someones photo album. When you go home to meet your special someone&#039;s parents, what is the first thing that they do? ... pull out the baby pictures. They are adoreable. Whether a celebrity decides to display or not display pictures of their children should be thier choice as should how they choose to do it. I am just as against the whole paparazzi situation as everybody else is. I think it&#039;s sad that some clebrity parents feel forced to have thier children&#039;s pictures taken. What I don&#039;t understand is how people tend not to believe that they feel this way, and insist that they just want attention. In some cases maybe they do, but isn&#039;t that the nature of the entertainment industry. Why be so suprised and upset? Isn&#039;t that why you are on this site? to give them the attention that they are seeking.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I am a faithful reader of celebrity Baby Blog.As long as I have been looking at this sight I have never felt compelled to make a comment. I find it funny that people who look at this sight would have such strong comments about how wrong it is for a celebrity partent to have their children&#8217;s pictures taken. This sight is here because people like to see the babies. It&#8217;s like looking at someones photo album. When you go home to meet your special someone&#8217;s parents, what is the first thing that they do? &#8230; pull out the baby pictures. They are adoreable. Whether a celebrity decides to display or not display pictures of their children should be thier choice as should how they choose to do it. I am just as against the whole paparazzi situation as everybody else is. I think it&#8217;s sad that some clebrity parents feel forced to have thier children&#8217;s pictures taken. What I don&#8217;t understand is how people tend not to believe that they feel this way, and insist that they just want attention. In some cases maybe they do, but isn&#8217;t that the nature of the entertainment industry. Why be so suprised and upset? Isn&#8217;t that why you are on this site? to give them the attention that they are seeking.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HardCandy</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HardCandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bancie, it is one thing to come to a celeb baby site and hope to see pics it is another to email the editor and ask &quot;Do you know when Halle is going to do show us Nahla&quot; that is entitlement. Like I said I have no problem with celebs doing photos shoots but to say you&#039;re doing it to protect your child is silly because a photo shoot is not going to stop the paps from taking more pics later.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Brad and Angie are on another plateau of celebrity so I can understand them doing it for protection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>
Bancie, it is one thing to come to a celeb baby site and hope to see pics it is another to email the editor and ask &#8220;Do you know when Halle is going to do show us Nahla&#8221; that is entitlement. Like I said I have no problem with celebs doing photos shoots but to say you&#8217;re doing it to protect your child is silly because a photo shoot is not going to stop the paps from taking more pics later.</p>
<p>Brad and Angie are on another plateau of celebrity so I can understand them doing it for protection.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooke</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brooke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I respect halle for not pimping out her baby 2 weeks after she was born, like so many celebrities do. Although halle is one celebrity, I&#039;m dying to see her baby, but she doesn&#039;t seem as greedy for money as other celebrities do. Jen garner didn&#039;t sell her baby pics and I saw salma hayek on 20/20 last week saying she didn&#039;t wanna sell her baby pics, but she knew her fans were curious so that&#039;s why she released her own picture for no money. I think that&#039;s a great way to do it. Although it doesn&#039;t bother me when celebrities get money for their baby pics, it&#039;s their kid and if the magazines wanna pay 4 million for a baby, so be it. I do think it&#039;s a double standard though, when some of them sell wedding pics, baby pics, or do photshoots for no reason, and than say I just wanna have a private life, you can&#039;t have it both ways especially when so many of them are hungry for attention lol. Halle has been so open about wanting to be a mom, her pregnancy, and her issues in life, I hope she does release a picture of her daughter, I bet she is a beauty&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I respect halle for not pimping out her baby 2 weeks after she was born, like so many celebrities do. Although halle is one celebrity, I&#8217;m dying to see her baby, but she doesn&#8217;t seem as greedy for money as other celebrities do. Jen garner didn&#8217;t sell her baby pics and I saw salma hayek on 20/20 last week saying she didn&#8217;t wanna sell her baby pics, but she knew her fans were curious so that&#8217;s why she released her own picture for no money. I think that&#8217;s a great way to do it. Although it doesn&#8217;t bother me when celebrities get money for their baby pics, it&#8217;s their kid and if the magazines wanna pay 4 million for a baby, so be it. I do think it&#8217;s a double standard though, when some of them sell wedding pics, baby pics, or do photshoots for no reason, and than say I just wanna have a private life, you can&#8217;t have it both ways especially when so many of them are hungry for attention lol. Halle has been so open about wanting to be a mom, her pregnancy, and her issues in life, I hope she does release a picture of her daughter, I bet she is a beauty</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bancie1031</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag/#comment-106809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bancie1031]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/newborns-on-mag#comment-106809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree with Jenn and ItsaMEEE. I personally think it&#039;s hypocritical to make statements like:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I can&#039;t believe people feel entitled to see these children. Why?&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&quot;She does not belong to the public she belongs to her family so why are people asking to see pics of a child that is not there&#039;s?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;It is nice to see some celebs hold on to what belongs to them instead of putting their children in the public arena.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Berry&#039;s baby doesn&#039;t belong to the public and those emailing to ask when they will see the baby should ask why it is so important to them.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
This is just to name a few that caught my attention right away. Your saying this and YET your on a site that is ABOUT celebrities and their children. How are you doing to contradict yourself like that? If your not interested and think they should keep their children to their families and out of the spot light then what are you doing coming here and look at their pictures and commenting on their children? Don&#039;t get me wrong I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion and has a right to state their opinion but I think it&#039;s truly hypocritical to make these statement on a site where you come to SEE celebrity babies. No I don&#039;t feel entitled to see their babies but I&#039;m interested in seeing them because most of these celebrities have shared the majority of their pregnancies with the public and we see their growing bellies and see their glows and their swollen feet, in general we feel like we&#039;re sharing in the pregnancy with them because they are being so open with us. Then when they have their babies we&#039;re curious. Just like if your friend was pregnant or a neighbor or a family member, now granted I know we only know these people from their movies, pictures and interviews but we kindof feel like a extended friend. I love CBB and appreciate their hard work on keeping this site up and running and up to date to the best of their abilities! Thank You!&lt;br /&gt;
Now on whether they should do it via magazine cover or just by walking outside and letting the paparazzi get the pictures, I&#039;m not sure. Certain celebrities I believe do the right thing by doing a magazine cover. Some state that they (the celebrities) don&#039;t honestly do it for the safety of their babies but for publicity I don&#039;t totally agree with that ..... If you remember correctly when Tom and Katie Holmes &amp; Britney and Kevin Federline (and I&#039;m sure their is more but these 2 come straight to mind when I read these post) didn&#039;t do a magazine cover right away, the paparazzi&#039;s were going all out to get photos of their babies ..... do you remember the aerial shots through windows of Suri? Or Britney down below walking with Sean Preston covered with a blanket by the pool? They were trying everything to get the &quot;FIRST&quot; photos of these babies ..... so just imagine what would have happened if they would have walked out of their front doors with these babies in hand not with them never being seen before. I remember seeing a picture of Shiloh taken by a paparazzi from a tree, it was all blurry but none the less .... this was after Shiloh&#039;s photo shot when we didn&#039;t see her again for a while. &lt;br /&gt;
I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is however a celeb decides to introduce their child is fine by me, and I believe they should do whatever they feel is best for them. Like Britney did when she waited with Jayden James because of everything that happened with Sean Preston (all the unwanted attention and criticism on her parenting skills and what not).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jenn and ItsaMEEE. I personally think it&#8217;s hypocritical to make statements like:<br />
&#8220;I can&#8217;t believe people feel entitled to see these children. Why?&#8221; <br />
&#8220;She does not belong to the public she belongs to her family so why are people asking to see pics of a child that is not there&#8217;s?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It is nice to see some celebs hold on to what belongs to them instead of putting their children in the public arena.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Berry&#8217;s baby doesn&#8217;t belong to the public and those emailing to ask when they will see the baby should ask why it is so important to them.&#8221;<br />
This is just to name a few that caught my attention right away. Your saying this and YET your on a site that is ABOUT celebrities and their children. How are you doing to contradict yourself like that? If your not interested and think they should keep their children to their families and out of the spot light then what are you doing coming here and look at their pictures and commenting on their children? Don&#8217;t get me wrong I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion and has a right to state their opinion but I think it&#8217;s truly hypocritical to make these statement on a site where you come to SEE celebrity babies. No I don&#8217;t feel entitled to see their babies but I&#8217;m interested in seeing them because most of these celebrities have shared the majority of their pregnancies with the public and we see their growing bellies and see their glows and their swollen feet, in general we feel like we&#8217;re sharing in the pregnancy with them because they are being so open with us. Then when they have their babies we&#8217;re curious. Just like if your friend was pregnant or a neighbor or a family member, now granted I know we only know these people from their movies, pictures and interviews but we kindof feel like a extended friend. I love CBB and appreciate their hard work on keeping this site up and running and up to date to the best of their abilities! Thank You!<br />
Now on whether they should do it via magazine cover or just by walking outside and letting the paparazzi get the pictures, I&#8217;m not sure. Certain celebrities I believe do the right thing by doing a magazine cover. Some state that they (the celebrities) don&#8217;t honestly do it for the safety of their babies but for publicity I don&#8217;t totally agree with that &#8230;.. If you remember correctly when Tom and Katie Holmes &#038; Britney and Kevin Federline (and I&#8217;m sure their is more but these 2 come straight to mind when I read these post) didn&#8217;t do a magazine cover right away, the paparazzi&#8217;s were going all out to get photos of their babies &#8230;.. do you remember the aerial shots through windows of Suri? Or Britney down below walking with Sean Preston covered with a blanket by the pool? They were trying everything to get the &#8220;FIRST&#8221; photos of these babies &#8230;.. so just imagine what would have happened if they would have walked out of their front doors with these babies in hand not with them never being seen before. I remember seeing a picture of Shiloh taken by a paparazzi from a tree, it was all blurry but none the less &#8230;. this was after Shiloh&#8217;s photo shot when we didn&#8217;t see her again for a while. <br />
I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is however a celeb decides to introduce their child is fine by me, and I believe they should do whatever they feel is best for them. Like Britney did when she waited with Jayden James because of everything that happened with Sean Preston (all the unwanted attention and criticism on her parenting skills and what not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

