Comments on: Denied: Michelle Branch not expecting second child http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:02:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Moms & Babies - People.comhttp://img2.timeinc.net/people/static/i/v4home/peoplelogo.pnghttp://celebritybabies.people.com20485 By: Meg http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle/#comment-162845 Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:33:25 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle#comment-162845

New album? Well, if they’re not having a new gorgeous baby, a new album would be okay too. :)

]]> By: Cass http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle/#comment-162846 Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:33:25 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle#comment-162846 Michelle has denied the rumor on her site (see post #12): http://www.michellebranch.com/index.php?s=c40149e37a611befa502a77bfb949eb1&showtopic=286

]]> By: Pam http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle/#comment-162847 Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:12:28 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle#comment-162847

That’d be great news and wouldn’t surprise me. Seems like a lot of people do that kind of spacing. I love their naming style and am happily surprised to see they are still together. I admit I doubter when they first married because of the age difference, but Michelle seems very mature.

]]> By: Meg http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle/#comment-162848 Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:48:56 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/rumor-michelle#comment-162848

Oh, I love her! I hope she is. She is a brilliant artist.

]]>