Comments on: Update: Denise Richards wants to terminate overnight privileges for Charlie Sheen with daughters http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/ Sun, 27 May 2012 03:21:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Moms & Babies - People.comhttp://img2.timeinc.net/people/static/i/v4home/peoplelogo.pnghttp://celebritybabies.people.com20485 By: Campbell http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90261 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:10:13 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90261

The “he said, she said” , I’ve seen in the papers, etc… ARE YOU KIDDING ME? CBB please close this “going no where debate down”… THANKS

]]> By: liz http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90263 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:06:32 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90263

I do not understand all the comments siding with Charlie given his very recent “past” and also this article I ready just over a year ago on the smoking gun website. You can read it for yourselves if you go to http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html. It all paints a very disturbing picture of Charlie and especially disturbing is page 12. Read it for yourselves.

]]> By: Open your eyes ladies http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90266 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:26:57 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90266

Um, ladies – Denise Richards was one of the high-class escorts that Heidi Fleiss employed. It’s a well-known “secret” in Hollywood. She’s no angel, darlings.

]]> By: Kate http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90269 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:30:28 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90269

Heather: I didn’t miss your point. I know exactly what you meant, I just don’t agree with it. Brooke is marrying their father, therefore she will be having visitation with those children, and she will be helping to raise them, and she will be affected in every way. I said that Denise is slandering him because I don’t believe her claims. They are merely defending themselves against her accusations (accusations, by the way, that have quite a few holes in them). So it does affect Brooke. It’s kind of harsh to act like a step mother isn’t a parent and doesn’t have a right to be upset about something that is affecting her step children. And the fact that they’re only engaged at this point should not affect the way that Brooke feels about the children or the level of concern she shows for those children or for their father. So she has every right to be involved in this.

]]> By: Heather http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90272 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:43:22 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90272 Re: Kate ”It has everything to do with her. Her fiancee is being slandered by his ex, and the children in question will be her step-children. Denise herself has said that the children are close with their soon-to-be stepmother. Just because they aren’t married yet doesn’t mean she doesn’t have a right to be concerned about something that affects every part of her life.”
You’re missing my point. The custody case really is no business of her’s. How is Charlie being ‘slandered’ by Denise? She’s not the one talking to the press, but Charlie and his fiancee are. If anything both of them are slandering Denise! If what’s been released (from the court documents) is the truth, Denise has every right to be concerned.
Now, when I say it’s nothing to do with her – the custody of the kids, visitation, etc, is nothing to do with her. They are not her kids. She will not be having visitation with them. She wouldn’t have a say over their upbringing (as this is Denise and Charlie’s responsibility). They’re not even her step-children yet. She certainly shouldn’t be talking to the press about it! I never said she couldn’t be concerned for the children, I’m sure a lot of us are but we’re not talking to the press about it, or in the same breath AS talking to the press, denying we would do that! Charlie & Denise’s children do NOT affect every part of his fiance’s life. I’m sorry, but they don’t. She will have a life completely seperate from Charlie’s children. They will affect her life in some way but certainly not every part of her life.

]]> By: Annoyomus http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90275 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:35:42 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90275

Mary- I know that Charlie said that….But I don’t trust him one bit!

]]> By: Shelly http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90278 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:12:25 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90278

I am sorry to say this but I think Denise just married Charlie for his money!She cant act or get a job all she does is shop and photo op…those poor little girls.

]]> By: LAILA http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90281 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:04:17 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90281

LAILA, you are comparing a man who hired prostitutes from Heidi Fleiss to a woman who dated her friend’s ex-husband. Wow.
——————————————–
Yup. I’m comparing them. So wow away. Oh and she didn’t seem to mind that he had hired prostitutes when she married him, had a child with him, left him and then went back to him, and then had a second child with him. So I find her sudden alarm about his behavior strange. it’s not like she didn’t know what she was getting into.

]]> By: Dancer http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90282 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:32:20 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90282

LAILA, you are comparing a man who hired prostitutes from Heidi Fleiss to a woman who dated her friend’s ex-husband. Wow.

]]> By: Kate http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6/#comment-90286 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:31:31 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/denise-richar-1-6#comment-90286

“First of all regardless as to whether Charlie is her fiance or not, she shouldn’t be getting involved in this battle, IMO. It’s nothing to do with her”

It has everything to do with her. Her fiancee is being slandered by his ex, and the children in question will be her step-children. Denise herself has said that the children are close with their soon-to-be stepmother. Just because they aren’t married yet doesn’t mean she doesn’t have a right to be concerned about something that affects every part of her life.

]]>