<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faith Hill photoshopped ad nauseum in Redbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MZ</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I bet she didn&#039;t know.  Kate Winslet threw a fit when she found out she&#039;d been photoshopped.  And, someone else already mentioned Katie Curic.  Bad on Redbook!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I bet she didn&#8217;t know.  Kate Winslet threw a fit when she found out she&#8217;d been photoshopped.  And, someone else already mentioned Katie Curic.  Bad on Redbook!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natasha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;ht, Well obviously she wouldn&#039;t admit to having anything to do with it :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just think that celebs don&#039;t just take a pic and leave don&#039;t they do interviews and approve things before they go out to newstands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know why anyone wouldn&#039;t WANT to look younger when they&#039;re 40.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>ht, Well obviously she wouldn&#8217;t admit to having anything to do with it <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I just think that celebs don&#8217;t just take a pic and leave don&#8217;t they do interviews and approve things before they go out to newstands.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why anyone wouldn&#8217;t WANT to look younger when they&#8217;re 40.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Faith Hill always seemed just a bit materialistic to me so I&#039;m not surprised it was re-touched. I&#039;m sure most of her photos are. Boo to Redbook.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Faith Hill always seemed just a bit materialistic to me so I&#8217;m not surprised it was re-touched. I&#8217;m sure most of her photos are. Boo to Redbook.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ht</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Natasha,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is entirely up to the magazine and is their fault. I doubt Faith had a say in it whatsoever. Over a decade ago, another popular magazine (can&#039;t remember which one) was under fire when they had Cher on their cover and completely made her look like she was 20 years younger than she was when in fact, similarly to Faith, cover, she looked great in the original untouched shot. It was all over the morning talk shows if I remember correctly, and Cher was reportedly outraged by it. I mean who wouldn&#039;t right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Natasha,</p>
<p>It is entirely up to the magazine and is their fault. I doubt Faith had a say in it whatsoever. Over a decade ago, another popular magazine (can&#8217;t remember which one) was under fire when they had Cher on their cover and completely made her look like she was 20 years younger than she was when in fact, similarly to Faith, cover, she looked great in the original untouched shot. It was all over the morning talk shows if I remember correctly, and Cher was reportedly outraged by it. I mean who wouldn&#8217;t right?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bren</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I am glad we all got to see the before but its definately the norm now to photoshop. I think that for Faith it probably would be nice to have her make up touched up in the photo(looks like they added darker eye makeup) but I do think the thin part is way to extreme. I mean she is a tall thin women naturally. I have always admired her healthy look because though she was tall and thin she always looked like she had a healthy glow to her. Its sad but the way our society is. Like Lee has stated people make such a huge deal about people bouncing back to their prepregnancy weight that I am not surprised. If we all focus less on how heavy an actress or actor is and focus more on the work then maybe it wouldn&#039;t be this way but right now that is not the case with society and it is getting to be quite sad annd extreme. I mean we are criticizing a magazine for photoshop yet we come here to oogle at celebrities&#039; children who aren&#039;t famous for their work but for their famous parents. That wasn&#039;t the norm years ago and years ago people would probably think we are nuts. I am not criticizing the website because I love it but I do see why these things happen and its a weird world we live in today.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I am glad we all got to see the before but its definately the norm now to photoshop. I think that for Faith it probably would be nice to have her make up touched up in the photo(looks like they added darker eye makeup) but I do think the thin part is way to extreme. I mean she is a tall thin women naturally. I have always admired her healthy look because though she was tall and thin she always looked like she had a healthy glow to her. Its sad but the way our society is. Like Lee has stated people make such a huge deal about people bouncing back to their prepregnancy weight that I am not surprised. If we all focus less on how heavy an actress or actor is and focus more on the work then maybe it wouldn&#8217;t be this way but right now that is not the case with society and it is getting to be quite sad annd extreme. I mean we are criticizing a magazine for photoshop yet we come here to oogle at celebrities&#8217; children who aren&#8217;t famous for their work but for their famous parents. That wasn&#8217;t the norm years ago and years ago people would probably think we are nuts. I am not criticizing the website because I love it but I do see why these things happen and its a weird world we live in today.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;many of you are &quot;disgusted&quot; with the redbook cover, but many of you are also the same mothers who day in and and out praise or are jealous of the celebrities for bouncing back to their pre-baby weight and proclaim that you wish you looked that good too. i have seen comments about readers who would like a tummy tuck or some other kind of plastic surgery to fix what your body has gone through after a pregnancy instead of being satisfied with how your body shape currently is. so, where shall we draw the hypocrisy line? all of you who want tummy tucks and want to drop the weight are also feeding into the airbrushed images that are on newsstands today, so lets not get all high and mighty about the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note from Danielle, CBB Publisher: Have you considered that wanting a tummy tuck or lipo may also have something to do with wanting to get back to one&#039;s pre-pregnancy body?  Pregnancy CAN wreak havoc on your body, especially if you gained a lot, so many women wish they could get back to the way they were, especially after having more than 1 kid.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not denying that there is a lot of pressure from Hollywood to be skinny, but I know that I would love to get rid of my belly that has plagued me my whole life and which pregnancy only made worse.  There are only so many situps you can do!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many of you are &#8220;disgusted&#8221; with the redbook cover, but many of you are also the same mothers who day in and and out praise or are jealous of the celebrities for bouncing back to their pre-baby weight and proclaim that you wish you looked that good too. i have seen comments about readers who would like a tummy tuck or some other kind of plastic surgery to fix what your body has gone through after a pregnancy instead of being satisfied with how your body shape currently is. so, where shall we draw the hypocrisy line? all of you who want tummy tucks and want to drop the weight are also feeding into the airbrushed images that are on newsstands today, so lets not get all high and mighty about the whole thing.</p>
<p><strong>Note from Danielle, CBB Publisher: Have you considered that wanting a tummy tuck or lipo may also have something to do with wanting to get back to one&#8217;s pre-pregnancy body?  Pregnancy CAN wreak havoc on your body, especially if you gained a lot, so many women wish they could get back to the way they were, especially after having more than 1 kid.  </strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not denying that there is a lot of pressure from Hollywood to be skinny, but I know that I would love to get rid of my belly that has plagued me my whole life and which pregnancy only made worse.  There are only so many situps you can do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brookefan</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brookefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The photo on the cover shows a robot and the photo on the right is of a human. Doesn&#039;t SHE , Faith, have anything to say about it? Kate Winslet doesn&#039;t let them do that to her image. Thank you for pointing it out. Thank you for insisting on reality.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The photo on the cover shows a robot and the photo on the right is of a human. Doesn&#8217;t SHE , Faith, have anything to say about it? Kate Winslet doesn&#8217;t let them do that to her image. Thank you for pointing it out. Thank you for insisting on reality.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennH</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JennH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The sad part about this is that if I saw the real Faith in person, based on these type of photos, I&#039;d assume she was an impersonator rather than the real deal.  lol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The sad part about this is that if I saw the real Faith in person, based on these type of photos, I&#8217;d assume she was an impersonator rather than the real deal.  lol
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilybett</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lilybett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 03:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve come to expect airbrushing in magazines, especially the covers. Brighten colours in the clothes to match the layout, flip images, take out the wrinkles and spots, etc. But I think there&#039;s a difference between that and inventing bodyparts like they seem to have done here. It looks like a hand on her thigh in the original, but it&#039;s a completely different arm in the other. Weird. I love these types of things, especially the Jamie-Lee Curtis before and after.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve come to expect airbrushing in magazines, especially the covers. Brighten colours in the clothes to match the layout, flip images, take out the wrinkles and spots, etc. But I think there&#8217;s a difference between that and inventing bodyparts like they seem to have done here. It looks like a hand on her thigh in the original, but it&#8217;s a completely different arm in the other. Weird. I love these types of things, especially the Jamie-Lee Curtis before and after.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot/#comment-119959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/faith-hill-phot#comment-119959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I would love to look how she looks in the untouched picture and i&#039;m only 22!! Lol! Why have they given her an anorexic arm???!!! In the picture on the left Faith looks like Jessica Simpson!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I would love to look how she looks in the untouched picture and i&#8217;m only 22!! Lol! Why have they given her an anorexic arm???!!! In the picture on the left Faith looks like Jessica Simpson!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

