RUMOR: Maggie Gyllenhaal's belly has tongues wagging

Maggie Gyllenhaal was at the New York premiere of her film Paris, Je T’aime on Tuesday wearing an oversized, free-flowing grey satin Yves Saint Laurent dress andappearing to have a bit of a bump that has raised some eyebrows. Her reps have not confirmed anything as of today.

Maggie gave birth to daughter Ramona, 7 months, last October.

What do you think? Is it just the dress? (We think she’s not- satin is not kind to lumps and bumps.)

Thanks to CBB reader Amanda.

Comments

Alex on May 4th, 2007

That is funny, when I was looking on people.com today and saw that photo that was the first thing I thought when I saw Maggie.. If she is pregnant congrants to her..

Stu Baner on May 4th, 2007

Publicist Colby Fede had something to say about this rumor at the ultra swank hollywood party for Sudan orphans yesterday. I think he’ll be quoted in the next issue of variety.

meghan on May 4th, 2007

wow – everyone is just obsessed with whether or not any celebrity is pregnant – huh? she has never been super thin – and she has seemed to be carrying a little post baby weight for a while. when i first saw this picture i thought she was actually looking thinner again – not pregnant. i would look like a cow in that dress – but i am pregnant – so that’s my excuse.

Mama Llama on May 4th, 2007

I also think that the cut of that dress is not the most figure-flattering. Anyone would look pregnant in a dress like that, don’t you think?

Jessica on May 4th, 2007

While it’s not the most flattering thing she could have worn, I don’t believe that she is pregnant. I always feel bad with stories like this. Can you imagine people speculating that you were pregnant again, pointing out your supposed baby bump, and you know for a fact that you’re not, it’s just your normal stomach? Talk about a kick to the ol’ self-esteem!

sarawara on May 4th, 2007

I don’t think so either.

Amy on May 4th, 2007

I think it’s just the dress or a postpartum body.

Morgan on May 4th, 2007

I dont think she is. It looks like a combination of the way she is standing, a satin dress and a “still gettin gback in shape” figure from when she gave birth ONLY 7 months ago! I think she looks great, i love that dress!

tink1217 on May 4th, 2007

i doubt it. i think its just the dress and maybe she hasn’t shed every baby pound yet!

Amber Smith on May 4th, 2007

I dont think so. I just think she’s not the type of mom that works out 6 hours a day. She wasn’t exactly a stick before getting pregnant either.

pink.lioness on May 4th, 2007

Honestly, I don’t know what people are talking about. What bump? That dress (in that satin material) is probably the most unforgiving piece of garment imaginable but still I can’t see anything there.

Melanie on May 4th, 2007

I wondered if she was pregnant when I initially saw that photo, too. But, I have also seen recent photos of her, and she has a normal, post-partum body of a normal, non-celebrity woman. Little tummy 7 months after having a babe is no big deal (I’m in the same boat!) I think it’s not the most flattering choice of dress, that’s all!

Charlotte on May 4th, 2007

its called having a baby 7 months ago and not having taken off all the weight yet!

Daze on May 5th, 2007

I would never think a mother of a 7 month old was pregnant unless she announces it herself. Not everyone looses all the baby weight immediately. I used to not care for Tori Spelling, for example, but she is handling have a little extra belly after having Liam with such pose and finesse, that I am now a fan. She sort of makes no excuses for it, it is normal, it happens, I am working on it, but not losing sleep over it kind of attitude. Horray Tori. Yes, she may not have had a career had her Dad not been Aaron Spelling, but of the lot of child stars and Hollywood offspring, she seems absolutly charming, well-adjusted, grounded and has made a smooth, successful transition from teen star to adult actress and mom.