not a real breastfeeder-one month barely counts. she wants to look like she’d do it all for her kids, but only if it’s convenient. i can understand though half of her cash cow is her udders and who wants to look at them hanging to her waist or tucked in her belt, really? breastfeeding ruins the mamms i know. so far i’ve done it for 3 years and may do it for one more. when i’m done i will see the surgeon b/c they went from nice grapes to saggy raisins–yucko!

I am 23 years old and have an 19 month old that I nursed for 12 months. Before my pregnancy I was an E and now I am about the same. I think that they hang a bit more now, I mean theres always been a bit of hang, there pretty big, but Im the only one that seems bothered by it. My hubby says that they look “lived in and happy” lol

i never breastfed either of my kids, my boobs did not get really nig during pregnancy and I have always worn a supportive bra. My breasts still sag a bit. Enough for me to notice. But, they still look good in a decent push up bra! I would never get implants, I am already a C/D , but I would definitely get a lift if I had the money! Go Brit if thats what you want, but I think yours still look great!

breastfeeding definately makes your boobs sag and look deflated like balloons left out from a party 3 weeks ago when you stop. i am a veteran breastfeeding momma/martyr. i have so far breastfed for 3 years total between two kids. i’ve seen moms who breastfeed for just a few months and those that don’t, their boobs look way better. however, we make a lot of sacrifices for our children’s well-being beginning from the moment we relize we are carrying our progeny en utero. it has many health benefits to baby from immunity to bonding to brain power. it also prevents cancer in mom. but after it’s all done, you may need a lift and implants you never needed before the whole baby nursing thing. i’m planning 2008 boob job!

Keep in mind that Brit most likely only breastfed each baby for a few weeks, if even that. It couldn’t have played THAT big a role in “ruining” her breasts like it might for some of the commenters who breastfed for months and years. My vote is for pregnancy in her case.

I’m still breastfeeding my baby, and I really believe that this is what is causing the sagging. I didn’t notice any sagging until about 4-5 months into the bfing process, so I don’t think pregnancy is what made them hang. I think I need a moment of silence to mourn my pre-bfing breats

RE: Britney
How do I say this gently…they don’t look saggy to me, because they don’t exactly look like genuine breast tissue (ok, they kind of look like implants). Maybe she’s already had them done and this is old news?

It’s the breast changes during pregnancy AND the initial post-partum engorgement that ALL moms go through, even if they don’t breastfeed, that changes a woman’s breasts.

Hey Britney, that kid is a little young to be weaned…..wait on the surgery and keep nursing your kid!

(And YES…..you CAN breastfeed after having breast surgery…..reduction/lift/enhancement/etc. It just depends on how the surgery is done.)

Christine- just because she was smoking does not mean she weaned already. Plenty of women smoke and bf, nicotine laced breastmilk is actually still preferable over forumla.

I don’t blame her, I think if I would ever get plastic surgery that would be the one thing I would do, and I don’t even have kids yet!!! Being that my breasts are larger they have always sagged and I have felt self conscious about them, IMO its her body doesn’t hurt anyone if she gets them, so if she wants to get them, then I say go for it Britney. (and I’m not even a Britney fan)

Why does anyone even believe Britney wants a boob job? It’s from In Touch magazine for goodness sake. The family insider is one of the writers that make up this crap! Even if it were true who cares. They are her boobs she can do want she wants.