Star magazine implies Katie Holmes is pregnant again

Despite her slimmed down physique, in this photo from Star magazine, soon-to-be wed Katie Holmes appears to be sporting a souvenir from her pregnancy with Suri- a little belly.  Because they are Star magazine, Star is announcing that Katie has a "bump" which leads people to believe she could be pregnant.  But given the photoshopping they did of Maddox Jolie Pitt’s closed eyes, I don’t buy it.  Girlfriend probably had a big lunch or bad posture.

Source: Popbytes.com and Star

Comments

Katie Holmes had Suri, not Shiloh.

- Rachel on November 15th, 2006

You’ve probably gotten a million corrections already, but Katie had Suri not Shiloh.

- staceymay on November 15th, 2006

she had suri no shiloh

- Brittany on November 15th, 2006

ummm.. i’m not sure if i’m reading this right— but Katie’s baby is Suri, not Shiloh

- rachel on November 15th, 2006

that is suri’s bump, not shiloh

- sdfs on November 15th, 2006

Think someone has their celebs and babies mixed up!? Shiloh and Maddox (last time Brad checked) belong to Angelina….and Katie has Suri….unless Brad has been busy…now we haven’t had that as a rumor yet!

- Scottish Mummy on November 15th, 2006

Do you mean Suri? Yeah, they probably photoshopped that pic or something. I’m not buying that she is pregnant again so soon. Then again, you never know.

- Cherish on November 15th, 2006

Poor girl!! – its just the way she’s standing, she’s kind of leaning into the counter. Also, her sweater is probably resting over the top of her jeans, which gives the illusion of a curve. Anyway – Who really does have a flat as a pancake stomach – women are supposed to have some curves – its ridiculous. Katie is such a beautiful girl, and she looks so happy at the moment. And why is the silly magazine calling her daughter Shiloh – that shows us a lot in my opinion.

- Emma on November 15th, 2006

Sorry to be a pain, but their daughter is called Suri, not Shiloh.

- Kirsty on November 15th, 2006

Pregnancy with Suri, not Shiloh.

- Tasha on November 15th, 2006

I am not sure I understand this…”soon-to-be wed Katie Holmes appears to be sporting a souvenir from her pregnancy with Shiloh”

And then it is talking about Maddox too…

This is Katie, and not Angie? Right?
Just making sure I get it…I am blonde! lol

- Stina on November 15th, 2006

Katie Holmes had a baby girl named, Suri, not Shiloh!

- Amy on November 15th, 2006

Or can she be pregnant again? I’m wondering.

- Julie W. on November 15th, 2006

Don’t you mean Suri?

- Shelly on November 15th, 2006

Uhm…shiloh is Angelina’s baby!!!!??

- Mariska on November 15th, 2006

She had Suri, not Shiloh…that was Angelina and Brad

- Robin on November 15th, 2006

Katie is the mom of Suri, not Shiloh…

- BooBoo on November 15th, 2006

Suri.

- R on November 15th, 2006

“…Katie Holmes appears to be sporting a souvenir from her pregnancy with Shiloh…”
i think you mean suri. Ü hehehe

- char on November 15th, 2006

um don’t you mean Suri? Because shiloh and Maddox are angelina jolie’s children. Now I’ve heard angelina was rumored to be pregnant also reported by star but I don’t believe the tabloids.

- Lindsay on November 15th, 2006

Shiloh? You mean Suri? What a major OOPS!

- Anne on November 15th, 2006

Shiloh? Maddox? Er, wrong celebrity mom.

- LG on November 15th, 2006

You mean Suri, not Shiloh.

- kesha on November 15th, 2006

you mean souvenir from her pregnancy with Suri I dont think she is either. Suri is only 6 months. I know they said they want another one soon- but I see them spoiling Suri for a little bit longer before they do that.

- laurenp on November 15th, 2006

You seem to be mixing up two stories and two celebrities…are you talking about Katie Holmes or Angelina Jolie?

- Valou on November 15th, 2006

You seem to be mixing up two stories and two celebrities…are you talking about Katie Holmes or Angelina Jolie?

- Valou on November 15th, 2006

Shiloh is Angelina’s kid, not Katie’s. Katie’s kiddo is named Suri. That’s what you meant, right?

- Ellie on November 15th, 2006

Baby’s name is wrong…

- Sarah on November 15th, 2006

shiloh? maddox? katie? worng names… the pic if of katie, but are you takling about angelina?

- Sara Halloran on November 15th, 2006

well….wouldn’t they be talking about SURI if they were talking about Katie Holmes? And ANGELINA if they were talking about SHILOH?

just a question….

- cara on November 15th, 2006

katie’s baby is named suri not shiloh

- ashley boydstun on November 15th, 2006

Ummm Was this maybe supose to be about Angelina? I am a little confused.

- Alicia on November 15th, 2006

Katie Holmes’s daughter is named Suri not Shiloh. Just to let you know

- Jessica on November 15th, 2006

Don’t you mean Suri?

- Alyssa on November 15th, 2006

I noticed a miss print in this post. It says the post is about Katie Holmes and she is in the picture, but it list her child by the name of Shiloh which is incorrect. Her child is Suri and Shiloh is Angelina’s child. I hope no one minds me pointing this out. Thanks.

- Kristin on November 15th, 2006

katie was pregnant with Suri, not Shiloh, as mentioned above

- jordyn on November 15th, 2006

Shiloh or Suri??

- Soljah on November 15th, 2006

what’s with the shiloh and maddox references??

wrong celeb

- rachel on November 15th, 2006

Katie’s baby is Suri. You wrote Shiloh. Oops! =)

- Jen on November 15th, 2006

“Katie Holmes appears to be sporting a souvenir from her pregnancy with Shiloh…”

Suri, not Shiloh

Too many celebrity babies to keep up with

- DeAnna on November 15th, 2006

Don’t you mean Suri?

- Jericho on November 15th, 2006

oops…i think you meant suri not shiloh!

- erin on November 15th, 2006

Is it supposed to say Shiloh in the post? Is that what Star had in the article or just an oversight?

- Roise on November 15th, 2006

Shiloh? I think you mean Suri

- Anonymous on November 15th, 2006

Love reading the news here. But, there appears to be an error in the children referenced. It should be Suri instead of Shiloh. And the mention of Maddox is accurate in light of the photoshopping…but I’m wondering if you included mention of him since you had Shiloh on the mind??

- stacy on November 15th, 2006

Dont you mean Suri and not Shiloh?

- Posh_Fan on November 15th, 2006

Katie Holmes appears to be sporting a souvenir from her pregnancy with Shiloh???

I think that’s supposed to say Suri

- Sandy on November 15th, 2006

umm i think there a typo somewhere here isnt this a pic of katie holme and but shilo is not her child?

- Sara on November 15th, 2006

“Sporting a little souvenir from her pregnancy with Shiloh”

Katie Holmes, the celebrity surrogate. Or else it could be you meant to say she was pregnant with SURI.

- Bananas on November 15th, 2006

Although the headline says “Katie Holmes,” you mention both Shiloh and Maddox in the story. Maybe you got your stories crossed?

- Annie on November 15th, 2006

Katie gave birth to Suri, not Shiloh. Lots of little mistakes lately…,

- Rowan on November 15th, 2006

looks like the shirt is just big in the front a bit. I really don’t think she is pregnant again. I wouldn’t doubt it a year from now though.

- tink1217 on November 15th, 2006

quick correction…katie holmes gave birth to suri, not shiloh! although that would be an interesting twist…

- janice on November 15th, 2006

Katie had Suri, not Shiloh. Isn’t Star the same magazine that used Photoshop to give her a big baby bump last time around, making her look much further along than she really was? It’s not out of the realm of possibility that they’re at it again.

- RetailWhore on November 15th, 2006

I wouldn’t believe anything that Star magazine prints. I’m sure that pic is photoshopped.

- Angie on November 15th, 2006

I say it’s a bad angle or she’s not sucking in. The pictures of her thursday at an event were slim and stunning, I don’t think she’s pregnant again.

- Kori on November 15th, 2006

She did have a slouch-related pooch way before she ever announced she was pregnant last year. Remember the white dress she wore at the Oprah gala event? She had a pooch then.

- Cate on November 15th, 2006

Was google searching and found some other pics of Katie from that day

http://www.tomkatcrazy.com/katie-holmes-doing-some-pre-wedding-shopping/#more-294

She really does NOT look pregnant in those pics.

- Zoey on November 15th, 2006

Can we say BLOAT? I guess celeb women aren’t suppose to get bloated at their time of the month.

- Lorus on November 16th, 2006

I love her sunglasses in the other pictures. Anyone know what they are? Probably waaaaay out of my price range though.

- Lorus on November 16th, 2006

From the blurry little label on the side, I’m *guessing* they’re Chanel, although I can’t say for sure.

- Zoey on November 16th, 2006

Oh for heaven’s sake, they photoshopped that picture. You can see the clone marks where they copied the cloth of her shirt to make it look like she has a baby bump!! Honestly, the lengths these people go to to sell magazines is sad…

- Marissa on November 17th, 2006