More photos of Suri Cruise in Vanity Fair

Leave it to Gawker to scan and post photos from the Vanity Fair issue that hit newsstands in NYC today before I can even manage to get dressed.  Here’s one sweet photo of Katie Holmes playing with baby Suri.

They have somehow obtained a photo of Suri Cruise, Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise  from the Annie Leibovitz shoot that is not in the  Vanity Fair issue.  That’s because it’s photoshopped and the baby is not Suri! 

(At the time I originally posted this at 10 am, there was no disclaimer.  Now there’s one saying: "A Special Note to Our Readers (and the Vanity Fair PR Department): This is a parody. A parody.The Asian baby photoshopped into this image is not meant to representthe Asian baby shown in the actual image. The baby in this photo is not Tom Cruise’s daughter. As far as we know; the dude gets around. Thank you for your wisdom and understanding.")

Comments

I feel so bad for them. Yes, Tom has done some weird (okay, really weird) things, but why can’t his daughter be left out of it. Sure she looks different than in the other pics that were touched up but I could post two pics from the same time of my son and they’d be the same. He has very different eyes than anyone in our families, but he is ours! They have their own traits and who knows where they come from. It could be many years ago, there was someone Asian (for arguments sake) and it pooped up in Suri.

I think she is beautiful even with the angry stare in that pic that Gawker posted. She is probably just opening/closing her eyes when the camera got the shot.

- teri on September 6th, 2006

There is something wrong with that second picture. Katie and Tom look great, but Suri does not look normal. It has to be some bad photoshop because she looks so cute in the other pictures.

- LaMama on September 6th, 2006

I love that Suri. Her expressions are priceless. I love the one of Kate and Suri. Kate looks so HAPPY as she should be to have a healthy, beautiful baby and a great fiance. Suri is just so much like the both of them. And for everyone who keeps saying she is Asian, come on, she looks EXACTLY like both of her parents. She is BEAUTIFUL!!!

- M (michie) on September 6th, 2006

She does look kinda scary in the picture that Gawker released. But she is very cute in the others and yes she does look to be a bit asain but so did i when i was born, my mum thought they gave her the wrong child!! She’ll change over time.

- JolieLover4Life on September 6th, 2006

Gawker photoshoped the pic of her looking at the camera. Go to JJB and you can see the original.

- estelle on September 6th, 2006

now i’m really confused – on that web page it says that this pic is a parody and admit it’s photoshopped

- w on September 6th, 2006

this photo looks so different! her eyes are much smaller. In fact, she looks exactly like Josh Hartnett! LOL Something odd about it for sure, don’t buy the Cruise hype, it’s all timed for damage control following the Paramount debacle. Katie now goes shopping with both grannies and dines at the Ivy, just to make sure we all got a good look at the happy family and their minders (one goes to the Ivy only to be photographed). Nothing against Suri, but her parents are master media manipulators. Poor child.

- millie on September 6th, 2006

i’m pretty sure this photo is a parody, as gawker says, not an actual photo of Suri Cruise

- erica on September 6th, 2006

Gawker says it’s photoshopped. It’s not a real pic!

- katie on September 6th, 2006

The photo at this link is not real – it is a photoshopped version of the original. The website does acknowledge this, but it would be good if you put that above your link. It is a bit mean spirited. Quote from the webpage: “A Special Note to Our Readers (and the Vanity Fair PR Department): This is a parody. A parody. The Asian baby photoshopped into this image is not meant to represent the Asian baby shown in the actual image. The baby in this photo is not Tom Cruise’s daughter. As far as we know; the dude gets around. Thank you for your wisdom and understanding.”

- Alana on September 6th, 2006

I cant seem to find all the pics that are posted on the site. I just see 3

- kim on September 6th, 2006

um..im pretty sure that the one with tom holding suri and the mountain background is a fake photo, gawker makes a comment about how its a parody and not really suri… that probs explains why she looks so different and nowhere near as gorgeous as before!!!

- mabsat on September 6th, 2006

You realize that this “unretouched” photo is a spoof, right? The Gawker site makes that disclaimer!

- JH on September 6th, 2006

hold on, is that really suri in the pics or a fake suri?
i’m confused…
what is parodied?

- natalie on September 6th, 2006

hi danielle. i just recently found all the pictures, and figured you’d might want to post them! if you want me to send them to you..email me @ [e-mail]!!

- liana on September 6th, 2006

wheres the link to all the pics online of her

- JessiJamie on September 6th, 2006

that child looks half black and half white mmmmmm wonder who the parents really are! THERE IS NO PROBLEM with that just they are weirdos and toms son conner is half black????

- anon on September 6th, 2006

i know everybaby is gorgeous and a gift but she is absoutley scrumptious.congratulations tom and katie

- carly on September 7th, 2006

I do not see what all this craziness about her not being there daughter. Before the pictures came out I thought it was odd and questioned whether or not she was even pregnant and if it was Tom’s baby. Once I saw the pictures..you can definately see BOTH parents in this child. Both parents have dark hair, so does baby suri, if you got to one of the katie holme’s fan sites and look at a pic of her when she was 5 – you would be shocked at what she looked like…but it definately resembles baby Suri. She is a beautiful little girl…now her parents may not be the best, but hey, who has perfect parents anyway.

- Leah on September 7th, 2006