It truly is amazing how people take a total nothing (no information) and fabricate the most bizarre rumors and gossip out of it. The poster who said Tom and Katie had been out tons of times without their baby – HELLO! There have been like 4 or 5 spottings of Katie outside of the house in like 3 MONTHS! Are you some kind of idiot? How do you take this information and turn it into “but they have been out in a public tons of times without suri.” Excuse me, but only Tom has by necessity of his job. And we haven’t really seen hide nor hair of him since MI:III promo was finished, and he went off to build their dream home away from Beverly Hills.

“Constant” bonding? What the hell are you talking about!?? As a mother of 2, I would have gone nuts if I spent 3 straight months at home with my newborns without getting out of the house. If Katie did that you would be calling her a “captive”, “under house arrest”, or “a recluse”.

How could the baby have never left the house if Katie took Suri to Colorado to visit her grandparents?

I mean come on people! For the sake of humanity! I thought the human race was more intelligent than this!! I mean granted we spend way to much time worrying about their lives, but at least we could try to keep the facts straight!! ARRRRGGGHHH!!! (:))

There’s a fun photo simulation of what Suri might look like as an adult over at http://www.newsflashnow.com … it’s interesting, if a little creepy

I bet the baby is not that pleasing to look at. And I don’t just mean “baby ugly” – I am talking about maybe malformed in the face and they are just having tough time with it.

This is silly. I’m a Scientologist and there is nothing that I know of about “not allowing babies outside”. It’s just hogwash. I have no idea why Tom isn’t showing his baby off to the world, but it has nothing to do with Scientology.

I find all this funny. First, it appears Tom did try auctioning off the photos of his “Angel” however the prices didn’t get as high as he had hoped and yanked the deal. Now, he claims it is due to his religious beliefs. Yeah right, yep we believe you.

After this he goes and slams “Brangelina” for exploiting their daughter to the highest bidder to publicize themselves because they have no movie coming out. Hmm, why would he even think that? Maybe because he used his daughter’s birth?

Last, yes I’m sure he’ll do it on his own time. Once the price is right.

I agree with many of the other ladies and their posts about whether Katies Holmes has a say in this whole matter. It seems like the only person we’ve heard from at all since the birth of Suri, and throughout the pregnancy for that matter, has been Tom. I quote “TOM will do it in HIS own time?” (bolding my own…) What does KATIE have to say? It really seems to me (and sad it is) that it’s not really Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, or TomKat, or anything of the sort. It’s really become Tom Cruise and that-young-woman-he’s-with-who-used-to-be-an-entity-of-her-own-but-wait-what’s-her-name-again?

Well here is my opinion of the whole thing, but remember this is only my opinion. The baby does NOT exist. I’m very happy for Nicole Kidman, she finally found happiness with someone who truly loves her. True the whole Angelina Joli-Pitt thing was alot, but all the money went to charity that was made off the pictures. But Tommy boy wouldn’t give the money to charity, it would go straight to his “cult” I guess nobody cares to see Suri now, since he really didn’t handle it very well with public. Unless the money went to charity, who would want to buy pictures of a baby that does NOT exist? He scammed so many people with Katie. Oh well this is only my opinion. I wouldn’t see any of his movies for any money. So take it any way you want.

I’ve been a Scientologist for over 20 years. There is no truth at all to these rumors about Scientology and babies. When our kid was born my wife and I took him everywhere. There’s nothing in Scientology at all that says anything about not showing your baby.

Whatever Holmes and Cruise are doing is their own personal choice.

best,
Greg Churilov

i just think it is weird there have been no pictures of them taking her out to the car in her car seat or anything. if they don’t want to sell pictures to people magazine, whatever. but i think it is strange that she has never left the house! tom and katie are out going places, leaving their tiny baby in the care of others. i would think that scientology would promote constant mother/baby bonding. going out for an afternoon without the baby is one thing, but they have been out in a public tons of times without suri.

again, we are treading into dangerous territory, but coincidently it coincides with our discussion. Connor and Isabella are now 11 and 13. they want to be as normal as possible. they want to go out and be with their friends, seeing as how they are homeschooled. what did people want Tom to do, tie Bella and Connor to a chair?

I firmly believe the paparazzi is capable of pretty much anything. if they thought pictures of Nicole Kidman would sell, they would take pictures of Nicole at her children’s games. people care about tom, and that is why HIS pictures sell.

Tom does not want to exploit his children, but he also doesnt want them to lead sheltered lives. they’re gonna do what they wanna do, whether there are 20 or 200 paparazzi waiting for them!